Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Tobin
_Emeritus
Posts: 8417
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:01 pm

Re: Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

Post by _Tobin »

Madison54 wrote:Tobin,
I agree with your answer above....thanks.

Now, can you (or anyone) answer this question?

All the apologists keep harping that this is not racial but is a matter of lineage. So, when those members were denied the priesthood prior to 1978, was their lineage checked (ie. their genealogy, etc.) or did they just go by the color of their skin when denying them?
It was pure racism. It was disgusting and unwarranted. IF they had been lead by revelation instead of their own narrow biases, they would have embraced MLK as a prophet as I do (because he spoke the truth) and changed their ways then instead of waiting so long that it became painfully obvious that they had to repent (change) of this.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"You lack vision, but I see a place where people get on and off the freeway. On and off, off and on all day, all night.... Tire salons, automobile dealerships and wonderful, wonderful billboards reaching as far as the eye can see. My God, it'll be beautiful." -- Judge Doom
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

Post by _MsJack »

by the way, I've always been a bit miffed that, even in his statement where he's answering for his own errors on the blacks and the priesthood issue, Elder McConkie calls the members to repentance rather than stating that he needed to repent himself. The only error he admits to on his own part is "speaking with limited understanding."

Even when the leaders are undeniably wrong, it's still the members who are wrong.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

Post by _Molok »

maklelan wrote:They are cowards for not wanting to directly challenge something they believed to have been God's will without feeling they had been compelled by revelation to do so? That makes men who believed themselves to be conduits of God's will on earth cowards?

Maybe not cowards, but they obviously weren't conduits of God's will, and should make everything else they taught suspect.
_SteelHead
_Emeritus
Posts: 8261
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 1:40 am

Re: Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

Post by _SteelHead »

Race = lineage.

Anyone saying other wise is trying to sell you something. Anyone who says the ban has nothing to do with race is trying to "spin" the past and is trying to ignore brother Brigham.
It is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener at war.

Some of us, on the other hand, actually prefer a religion that includes some type of correlation with reality.
~Bill Hamblin
_Fence Sitter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

Post by _Fence Sitter »

Madison54 wrote: Now, can you (or anyone) answer this question?

All the apologists keep harping that this is not racial but is a matter of lineage. So, when those members were denied the priesthood prior to 1978, was their lineage checked (ie. their genealogy, etc.) or did they just go by the color of their skin when denying them?

race=lineage.

Those that keep harping that it is a 'lineage' thing are just trying to avoid using a more politically charged word.


As the church expanded world wide and the question arose more and more often, the definition of who was black (cursed) and who was not, changed. It became increasing obvious that the criteria to refuse the priesthood was based on arbitrarily defined lines since it was/is impossible to determine who actually descended from Cain/Ham.

Based on the latest LDS newsroom release it is also clear that the ban is no longer considered doctrine.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Re: Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

Buffalo wrote:
... He continued, quite powerfully, “I know it could. I know the Lord could change his policy and release the ban and forgive the possible error which brought about the deprivation. If the time comes, that he will do, I am sure” (Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, 448-49 (1963).

Thanks for quoting this. I was unaware of this statement by SWK, when, as early as 1963, he conceded the priesthood ban was a "possible error." Again, not to 'beat a dead horse,' but it IS time for the Church to issue an official apology and to renounce once and for all the priesthood ban and all reasons offered to support of it. C'mon, Brethren, stand for something!!!
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

Post by _harmony »

Rollo Tomasi wrote: C'mon, Brethren, stand for something!!!


That would require that they repent. Publically acknowledge that they were wrong. The sun will stop and the earth will implode before that happens.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

Post by _Buffalo »

Kevin Graham wrote:Loran Blood's long lost brother just posted in DCP's thread, the following:

Perhaps blacks were not valiant in the pre-mortal war. Perhaps they initially sided with Lucifer, but were only barely persuaded at the last minute to follow Jesus Christ, fearing the imminent prospect of forever losing their right to be born. Culturally, blacks are and have been the least self reliant and the most prone to seek entitlements from state and federal governments. What percentage of America's population on welfare are blacks? I don't know, but I'm guessing the majority of welfare recipients are black. It's not racist, it's demographics. Most blacks vote liberal. Liberalism promotes socialism and dependency on government entitlements at taxpayer expense. It's not racism, it's politics.

Look at the behavior of every African government toward its own people. Blacks oppressing blacks. Most crimes against blacks are committed by blacks. Imagine that cultural mentality being given priesthood authority prematurely, just to be politically correct and placate someone's fear of being labeled a racist. Imagine prematurely handing the authority of God to a culture prone to the despotic exercise of even the authority of man. Call me a racist. I'm not one, but I am taking a big risk by speculating on this matter in a public forum.

Bottom line: Jesus Christ is the head of the Church, and he has his reasons for the timing of blacks getting the priesthood in 1978. I don't know the reasons behind it. I enjoy speculating, but at the end of the day, I will align myself with the words of the prophets, even if I do not agree with them or understand them.


Edit: sorry, I misunderstood, thought that Loran himself said this.

Of course, given Loran's claim that slavery wasn't racist, he might as well have said this.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_consiglieri
_Emeritus
Posts: 6186
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm

Re: Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

Post by _consiglieri »

MsJack wrote:by the way, I've always been a bit miffed that, even in his statement where he's answering for his own errors on the blacks and the priesthood issue, Elder McConkie calls the members to repentance rather than stating that he needed to repent himself. The only error he admits to on his own part is "speaking with limited understanding."


I think McConkie left the door wide open with his injunction that Mormons forget everything that was said on the subject in the past because the leaders "had a limited understanding."

If they had a "limited understanding" then, is it not likely they continue to have a "limited understanding"?

And what might they say today that will not be unsaid tomorrow when "more light and knowledge" comes to them?

Things fall apart. The center cannot hold.
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.


All the Best!

--Consiglieri
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
_consiglieri
_Emeritus
Posts: 6186
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm

Re: Popular BYU Randy Bott Takes Heat for Comments

Post by _consiglieri »

Buffalo wrote:I guess we know what Loran likes to do in his spare time - wear bedshits and light crosses on fire.


I am really hoping this was a typo . . .
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
Post Reply