William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Among all of Will's references to "masturbation" and/or viewing women in a sexual light, this is the one you choose to single out, Ludd? Why is that, I wonder? I mean, *I* already know the answer, but why don't you fill us in?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _beastie »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Among all of Will's references to "masturbation" and/or viewing women in a sexual light, this is the one you choose to single out, Ludd? Why is that, I wonder? I mean, *I* already know the answer, but why don't you fill us in?


LOL. Any doubts I once had about Ludd being a Schryver sock puppet are now erased. It's Schryver, no doubt.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_TrashcanMan79
_Emeritus
Posts: 832
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:18 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _TrashcanMan79 »

Ludd wrote:
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Mr. William "My wife is the kind of woman you'd have to masturbate to" Schryver attacks, yet again, the nicest guy on the board.

V/R
Dr. Cam

I agree that this is rather offensive. Where is the link to this statement?

What do you find so offensive about this, Ludd?
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

TrashcanMan79 wrote:What do you find so offensive about this, Ludd?


A better question is what is more offensive about this statement than the others?
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_Ludd
_Emeritus
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:31 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _Ludd »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Among all of Will's references to "masturbation" and/or viewing women in a sexual light, this is the one you choose to single out, Ludd? Why is that, I wonder? I mean, *I* already know the answer, but why don't you fill us in?

Because working up the page here, it was the first thing I found.

Why do you think I singled it out, Doctor Kishkumen?
_TrashcanMan79
_Emeritus
Posts: 832
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:18 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _TrashcanMan79 »

Bob Loblaw wrote:
TrashcanMan79 wrote:What do you find so offensive about this, Ludd?


A better question is what is more offensive about this statement than the others?

Exactly my point.
_Ludd
_Emeritus
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:31 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _Ludd »

beastie wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:Among all of Will's references to "masturbation" and/or viewing women in a sexual light, this is the one you choose to single out, Ludd? Why is that, I wonder? I mean, *I* already know the answer, but why don't you fill us in?


LOL. Any doubts I once had about Ludd being a Schryver sock puppet are now erased. It's Schryver, no doubt.

???????

How exactly is it you reached this conclusion?
_Ludd
_Emeritus
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:31 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _Ludd »

TrashcanMan79 wrote:
Ludd wrote:What do you find so offensive about this, Ludd?

I think it's an inappropriate thing to say about one's wife. Don't you?
_Ludd
_Emeritus
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:31 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _Ludd »

Bob Loblaw wrote:
TrashcanMan79 wrote:What do you find so offensive about this, Ludd?


A better question is what is more offensive about this statement than the others?

I think it's substantially more offensive than other quotes I read from Schryver. That's why I asked for the link, to make sure it's not like other things I've seen here: allegations without evidence. Apparently it is, otherwise someone would have provided a link.
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

Ludd wrote:I think it's substantially more offensive than other quotes I read from Schryver. That's why I asked for the link, to make sure it's not like other things I've seen here: allegations without evidence.


Why is it "substantially more offensive"?
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Post Reply