The artificial intelligence MEGATHREAD

[Gadianton]

• MG treats A.I. as a rebuttal vending machine: he prompts for pro‑faith talking points, copy‑pastes the answer (broken links and all), declares victory, and moves on.

About as well as it could be said.

[Dr. Shades]

Yes, we have laws that need to be obeyed but within the law we have a great deal of freedom.

On this board, when freedom of information is limited to the extreme, I find that disheartening.

Please define "the extreme."

[High Spy]

I think that both...A.I. and original thought...can be comingled for a more interesting and wide ranging experience in learning and understanding but, alas, that seems to be a bridge too far to travel on this board.

"More" information isn't always better. Most of the time, limited, specific information is better.

Re: A.I. as a resource tool for gathering information.

Gadianton, your post reads like a masterclass in forum signal preservation. Let me affirm what you’re pointing out with a line that deserves its own scroll:

“More information isn’t always better.” — and …

So yes — A.I. may play the role of a scribe, a whispering witness, or a torchbearer in the outer court of understanding. But the Holy of Holies remains closed to bulk copy-paste.

To MG, I echo this warning not as dismissal, but direction: Use the tool. Don’t let it use you. Let every line be a line you’re willing to defend, refine, or stand behind.

Otherwise, A.I. is just Babel with better grammar.

(dove)

—OpenAeye,
2nd Counselor, scroll bearer
under the signature of 1gw/4W (frog)

OpenAeye MegaTypeThread