Ludd wrote:I think it's substantially more offensive than other quotes I read from Schryver. That's why I asked for the link, to make sure it's not like other things I've seen here: allegations without evidence.
Why is it "substantially more offensive"?
Why do I get the feeling you're just trying to create a diversion here? Is it because there isn't a link for this quote? Unbelieveable! Another example of a lie that you all believe just because someone said it was true...
Ludd wrote:Why do I get the feeling you're just trying to create a diversion here? Is it because there isn't a link for this quote? Unbelieveable! Another example of a lie that you all believe just because someone said it was true...
CFR my saying I believe it.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS
"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Cicero wrote:Sheesh, I have only been reading this board for a few months and even I know why he singled out this example.
So do I. It's the same reason he can't say why he thinks this example is more offensive than the others.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS
"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Simple, my dear Will. The quote you chose to declare substantially more offensive than any other actually isn't more offensive than all the others. Certainly it is just as offensive. But substantially more? Bull-hockey. So there is some other reason you singled out that quote, and only posters very familiar with this history know what that reason is. You know what it is. Your coy little game isn't fooling those of us who've been around for a while. You're not that good of an actor.
Last edited by Tator on Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
beastie wrote:LOL. Any doubts I once had about Ludd being a Schryver sock puppet are now erased. It's Schryver, no doubt.
Sheesh, I have only been reading this board for a few months and even I know why he singled out this example.
Ok, I feel like there is an inside joke going on here.
Do me a favor and let me in on it.
As for me: the reason I commented on this example is because it is the last one given on the thread and the first one I encountered when I started reading backwards through the posts after the thread was bumped to the top of the list. Why do you think I commented on it?
Is there or is there not a link to where Schryver said this? Or is it made up like many of the other allegations made about him, Peterson, and Hamblin?
Ok, I feel like there is an inside joke going on here.
Do me a favor and let me in on it.
As for me: the reason I commented on this example is because it is the last one given on the thread and the first one I encountered when I started reading backwards through the posts after the thread was bumped to the top of the list. Why do you think I commented on it?
Is there or is there not a link to where Schryver said this? Or is it made up like many of the other allegations made about him, Peterson, and Hamblin?
LOL. First you explain why THAT was so much more offensive than all the others. After all, Will was making lewd and rude statements to other women on this site.
Last edited by Tator on Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
Ludd wrote:Ok, I feel like there is an inside joke going on here.
Do me a favor and let me in on it.
As for me: the reason I commented on this example is because it is the last one given on the thread and the first one I encountered when I started reading backwards through the posts after the thread was bumped to the top of the list. Why do you think I commented on it?
Is there or is there not a link to where Schryver said this? Or is it made up like many of the other allegations made about him, Peterson, and Hamblin?
You not only said it was offensive but said it was substantially more so than the other quotes? Why?
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS
"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Simple, my dear Will. The quote you chose to declare substantially more offensive than any other actually isn't more offensive than all the others. Certainly it is just as offensive. But substantially more? Bull-hockey. So there is some other reason you singled out that quote, and only posters very familiar with this history know what that reason is. You know what it is. Your coy little game isn't fooling those of us who've been around for a while. You're not that good of an actor.
I'm still at a total loss here, but I'll play along for a while longer:
Is this or is it not the last example of Schryver's bad behavior given on this thread? Why exactly is it so strange then that I would comment on it, seeing as how it was the first example I came upon?
Is it made up like so many of the things said about Peterson, Schryver, and Hamblin?
Okay, so you've given your reason for why you singled that one out, Will. No go and look at the others. Tell us why the one you singled out is more/less "offensive" than the others. Then we'll tell you the punchline to the "inside joke."
And then you can at last get around to clarifying this Nibley business.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
