just me wrote:
The leaders have said conflicting things so he is fine. They have also likened it unto being disabled.
I'm wondering if ol' subby here is against all people with 'genetic abnormalities' getting married...
why would i be against "all"?
i mean someone with MSUD (maple syrup urine disease) is obviously fine...but isn't genetic abnormalities the main justification for our society not allowing incestuous relationships?
And the idea of "passing on" disease or deformities is not foreign to our society...
when a blood test was required for a marriage license its purpose was to determine if either applicant had a disease which would be passed on to their children. This was an obvious concern before the days of penicillin..but alas, science has yet to develop that immunization for LGBT.
And note the concern for something being passed on to children...an inherent assumption that the purpose of marriage was to provide children..this was the rule not the exception, because it is the virtue that society aspires for.
