Evolution Again!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Bret Ripley
_Emeritus
Posts: 1542
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:53 am

Re: Evolution Again!

Post by _Bret Ripley »

Gunnar wrote:Yes, I watched it. Did you watch any of the rebuttals to it--like these, for example?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxysZmNsyDk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w0FiwfyUMM
To quote one of my favorite posters: Bumpidy Bump Bump! :smile:

Thanks, Gunnar. These two videos expose as falsehoods several of the key claims made in the video Ceeboo linked. I hope he will give them a fair chance to inform his opinion on the matter.
_Gunnar
_Emeritus
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:17 am

Re: Evolution Again!

Post by _Gunnar »

Bret Ripley wrote:
Gunnar wrote:Yes, I watched it. Did you watch any of the rebuttals to it--like these, for example?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxysZmNsyDk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w0FiwfyUMM
To quote one of my favorite posters: Bumpidy Bump Bump! :smile:

Thanks, Gunnar. These two videos expose as falsehoods several of the key claims made in the video Ceeboo linked.
You're welcome, Bret--and thanks to you for your own interesting and valuable contributions to my understanding and appreciation of this subject! :smile:
I hope he will give them a fair chance to inform his opinion on the matter.
I hope so too. Even if they don't change his mind, I hope he will find them interesting and not entirely without merit. At the very least, I hope he realizes or will come to realize that even if evolution is true (as is supported by already enormous and still accumulating amounts of confirming evidence), that doesn't, by itself, necessarily preclude belief in a supreme, divine creator.

What say you to that, Ceeboo?
No precept or claim is more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.

“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.”
― Harlan Ellison
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Evolution Again!

Post by _Ceeboo »

Hey Gunnar and Mr. Ripley! :smile:
Gunnar wrote:What say you to that, Ceeboo?


I say "I don't watch things that are obviously influenced by satan and completely full of BLATANT LIES!"



Yes, I watched them (and have seen many others that were similar) and I found them both to be interesting and worthy of the time invested to watch. Thanks for posting them! :smile:

Now - if we can all get back to the REAL question:
If we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys? :razz:

Peace,
Cee - to the - Boo!
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Evolution Again!

Post by _Ceeboo »

Bret Ripley wrote:To quote one of my favorite posters: Bumpidy Bump Bump! :smile:


:smile:
_Bret Ripley
_Emeritus
Posts: 1542
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:53 am

Re: Evolution Again!

Post by _Bret Ripley »

Ceeboo wrote:Hey Gunnar and Mr. Ripley! :smile:
Gunnar wrote:What say you to that, Ceeboo?


I say "I don't watch things that are obviously influenced by satan and completely full of BLATANT LIES!"
Curses, foiled again. (Exits, stage left.)
Now - if we can all get back to the REAL question:
If we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys? :razz:
Aha! Gotcha! The answer is: there aren't. I've been to plenty of zoos, and never in my life have I seen a still monkey.
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Evolution Again!

Post by _Ceeboo »

Bret Ripley wrote:Aha! Gotcha! The answer is: there aren't. I've been to plenty of zoos, and never in my life have I seen a still monkey.


:lol:

"Gotcha?" You did indeed!

Ripley - 1
Ceeboo - 0

(But the game is long from over. Stay tuned!) :smile:

Peace,
Ceeboo
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Evolution Again!

Post by _ludwigm »

Not only the raccoon...

California scientists discover mouse-like mammal related to elephants
reuters wrote:A new mammal discovered in the remote desert of western Africa resembles a long-nosed mouse in appearance but is more closely related genetically to elephants, a California scientist who helped identify the tiny creature said on Thursday.

The new species of elephant shrew, given the scientific name Macroscelides micus, inhabits an ancient volcanic formation in Namibia and sports red fur that helps it blend in with the color of its rocky surroundings, said John Dumbacher, one of a team of biologists behind the discovery.

Genetic testing of the creature – which weighs up to an ounce (28 grams) and measures 7.5 inches (19 cm) in length, including its tail – revealed its DNA to be more akin to much larger mammals.

"It turns out this thing that looks and acts like shrews that evolved in Africa is more closely related to elephants," said Dumbacher, a curator of birds and mammals at the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco.

The findings, published in the Journal of Mammalogy, floored scientists, who said the only visible link between an African elephant and the diminutive shrew is its trunk-like nose.

An elongated snout is a common feature of various shrew species, many of which look like long-nosed mice externally, though shrews are not classified as rodents.

[#img] http://s3.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/ ... XMPEA5Q01Q[/img]
.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Evolution Again!

Post by _Quasimodo »

ludwigm wrote:Not only the raccoon...

California scientists discover mouse-like mammal related to elephants
reuters wrote:A new mammal discovered in the remote desert of western Africa resembles a long-nosed mouse in appearance but is more closely related genetically to elephants, a California scientist who helped identify the tiny creature said on Thursday.

The new species of elephant shrew, given the scientific name Macroscelides micus, inhabits an ancient volcanic formation in Namibia and sports red fur that helps it blend in with the color of its rocky surroundings, said John Dumbacher, one of a team of biologists behind the discovery.

Genetic testing of the creature – which weighs up to an ounce (28 grams) and measures 7.5 inches (19 cm) in length, including its tail – revealed its DNA to be more akin to much larger mammals.

"It turns out this thing that looks and acts like shrews that evolved in Africa is more closely related to elephants," said Dumbacher, a curator of birds and mammals at the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco.

The findings, published in the Journal of Mammalogy, floored scientists, who said the only visible link between an African elephant and the diminutive shrew is its trunk-like nose.

An elongated snout is a common feature of various shrew species, many of which look like long-nosed mice externally, though shrews are not classified as rodents.

Image
.


In fairness to Ceeboo, this cute little guy does resemble an elephant more than a raccoon resembles a whale. :wink:
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Evolution Again!

Post by _ludwigm »

Quasimodo wrote:In fairness to Ceeboo, this cute little guy does resemble an elephant more than a raccoon resembles a whale. :wink:

I should have highlighted this part of the first sentence:
"resembles a long-nosed mouse in appearance but is more closely related genetically to elephants"
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Bret Ripley
_Emeritus
Posts: 1542
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:53 am

Re: Evolution Again!

Post by _Bret Ripley »

ludwigm wrote:
Quasimodo wrote:In fairness to Ceeboo, this cute little guy does resemble an elephant more than a raccoon resembles a whale. :wink:

I should have highlighted this part of the first sentence:
"resembles a long-nosed mouse in appearance but is more closely related genetically to elephants"
It all started back when I was an ivory hunter searching for King Solomon's Elephant Shrew Graveyard and its legendary treasure in elephant shrew tusks. One day I was leading a band of Masai warriors and bearers across a lonely veldt. Out of nowhere, Pavel, my valet, was gored by bull elephant shrew. Did you know that an average of 60 cashew farmers per year are gored by bull elephant shrews? I didn't, but I learned it later. Pavel never got the chance, poor dumb bastard.

So, there I was, stuck in the middle of a vast African veldt preparing to pack out a treasure trove in elephant shrew tusks -- without a valet. So, naturally, I did what most men in my position would do: I sent a runner back to Dakar to hire a valet with good references and pressed on. I can only assume the runner was also gored by a bull elephant shrew, because I never saw him again. A few days after I despatched the runner the Masai leader remembered he'd left the water running back home and they all left me.

That was almost forty years ago. Forty years with no valet and no sign of King Solomon's Elephant Shrew Graveyard. But still I press on. Why do I do it? May as well ask why a man does anything. But I know that's no answer, not really. So let's just leave it at this: I do it because of that one day out there on that lonely veldt; let's just say I do it for Pavel, poor dumb bastard.

(Translation: bump)
Post Reply