Turns out - rcrocket is a bishop -

Post by **_Jason Bourne** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:14 am

Polygamy Porter wrote:Great, two bishops on the board.

Funny thing is that they both have something in common, besides their pretend clergy office of bishop.

FYI rCROCKet, your behavior on this board has been, at times, not very "christlike", nnn'k bishie?

Unbelievers forfeit the right to use another's Christianity against them.

Post by **_Polygamy Porter** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:16 am

Jason Bourne wrote:
Polygamy Porter wrote:Great, two bishops on the board.

Funny thing is that they both have something in common, besides their pretend clergy office of bishop.

FYI rCROCKet, your behavior on this board has been, at times, not very "christlike", nnn'k bishie?

Unbelievers forfeit the right to use another's Christianity against them.

Suck it Jace.

He is a Mormon bishop and is EXPECTED to exhibit behaviors that are deemed "christlike". I have not seen many from him on this board.

He is the one under the rules, not I.

Post by **_barrelomonkeys** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:16 am

Jason Bourne wrote:

Unbelievers forfeit the right to use another's Christianity against them.

Shouldn't believers subtly suggest that there are certain behavior that are Christ like? And some behaviors that are most definitely not?

Post by **_Jason Bourne** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:34 am

Polygamy Porter wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:
Polygamy Porter wrote:Great, two bishops on the board.

Funny thing is that they both have something in common, besides their pretend clergy office of bishop.

FYI rCROCKet, your behavior on this board has been, at times, not very "christlike", nnn'k bishie?

Unbelievers forfeit the right to use another's Christianity against them.
Suck it Jace.

Kiss off bud.
He is a Mormon bishop and is EXPECTED to exhibit behaviors that are deemed "christlike". I have not seen many from him on this board.

As noted, unbelievers forfeit the right to use one's Christianity against them. The fact that you are more`debase then others aggravates that further.

He is the one under the rules, not I.

You have no moral imperative. Your words are as shallow as all your postings here.

Post by **_Yong Xi** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:45 am

Jason Bourne wrote:
Polygamy Porter wrote:Great, two bishops on the board.

Funny thing is that they both have something in common, besides their pretend clergy office of bishop.

FYI rCROCKet, your behavior on this board has been, at times, not very "christlike", nnn'k bishie?

Unbelievers forfeit the right to use another's Christianity against them.

Did you mean to say "Unbelievers forfeit the right to use another's lack of Christianity against them."

Criticism for hypocrisy is fair game. Unfortunately, almost every human being is guilty of hypocrisy so the criticism really doesn't mean much.

_Yoda · Post by **_Yoda** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:18 am

rcrocket wrote:I don't like it but I guess I asked for it. Ms. Mod doesn't like me so I don't expect any favorable treatment. Just please don't go sending nasty letters to my minor children.

Hey Trix, you never responded to my Smith cite about the reduction of malaria, my Leonard cite countering the stuff about the reclaiming river, and the HC cite with the First Presidency proclamation (on the latter, you just mentioned the fact that Bennett was behind it, if I recall), but those three items refute every point you've been making. To accuse me of not providing sources, when I provide, them is a little "internet silliness" of your own.

rcrocket

I just now saw this thread. It looks like Bond already deleted all of the material, which I would have also done had I seen it before he did. This is unethical and horrible. Whatever our differences, Bob, I would never be a party to anything like this, and I'm glad the information was deleted. As I have mentioned before, I was also the victim of an Internet stalker, so this is not something to play around with. Shades has also been the victim of this.

I have the IP information of this poster, which I will gladly give you via PM.

It looks like this poster only posted one post.

I don't have Administrator rights, but I would ask Shades or Keene to please ban this poster immediately.

Post by **_Jason Bourne** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:39 am

Did you mean to say "Unbelievers forfeit the right to use another's lack of Christianity against them."

Either or. Does not really matter. in my opinion, when one does not believe in the parameters of a certain moral system they have no right to use it to bludgeon another when they THINK the other is not abiding by it.

Criticism for hypocrisy is fair game.

Is it not the ultimate hypocrisy to use something one does not even believe to beat on another. PP is a rabid Mormon hater. He uses its moral system, which he rejects, at every opportunity when an active Mormon is perceieved by PP to not measure up to that which PP rejects. That my friend is the ultimate hypocrisy.

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:00 am

Things we haven't found from the Bible:

(1) Evidence that Abraham existed (I know of 2 gravesites that are said to hold the remains of Abraham)

(2) Evidence that the Exodus ever took place

(3) Evidence of the plagues against Pharoah

(4) Evidence that Moses existed

(5) Evidence that Jesus existed

(6) Evidence that Paul wrote all New Testament books/epistles attributed to him

(7) Evidence that the burning bush happened (there is a site in the Holy Land that commemorates this)

(8) Evidence that the first 4 gospels were written by the authors we attribute them to...Matthew, Mark, Luke, John

(9) Evidence for the Ark of the Covenant

(10) Evidence for the 10 Commandment Tablets (either set)

Post by **_CaliforniaKid** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:23 am

Jersey Girl wrote:Things we haven't found from the Bible:

(1) Evidence that Abraham existed (I know of 2 gravesites that are said to hold the remains of Abraham)

(2) Evidence that the Exodus ever took place

(3) Evidence of the plagues against Pharoah

(4) Evidence that Moses existed

(5) Evidence that Jesus existed

(6) Evidence that Paul wrote all New Testament books/epistles attributed to him

(7) Evidence that the burning bush happened (there is a site in the Holy Land that commemorates this)

(8) Evidence that the first 4 gospels were written by the authors we attribute them to...Matthew, Mark, Luke, John

(9) Evidence for the Ark of the Covenant

(10) Evidence for the 10 Commandment Tablets (either set)

Some of these are debatable... but I'm curious as to the relevance to this thread.

Post by **_Runtu** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:32 am

CaliforniaKid wrote:
Some of these are debatable... but I'm curious as to the relevance to this thread.

I wondered the same thing. Here's an attempt to bring it back on topic:

More Things We Have No Evidence for:

1. Wade knows a synonym for "epistemic."
2. Mercury has any kind thoughts about anything LDS.
3. Mr. Scratch has a keyboard shortcut for "the good doctor."
4. Crock has ever criticized a Mormon for posting anonymously.
5. juliann has ever read anything by a postmodern philosopher or literary theorist.
6. Runtu is an actual human being and not a software simulation.