Did he consciously decide to compromise on his temple covenants? RM: I doubt it. Did he forget he made them? RM: I doubt it. Does he not take them seriously? RM: I doubt it. Does anyone, really? Was he lying when he said the oath of office would be his highest promise to God? RM: I doubt it. Both "oaths" to the same "God". One would expect "Omni-God" will grant discretion in such matters??
Mitt is simply another huckster selling himself to a gullible undiscerning public, generally speaking. A nice guy, with wife-&-kids, and as pointed out above, a "bad-haircut". Represents the status que as well as anybody. Have to do with that until a real leader, with courage, emerges sometime in the future...
As i see it... Roger
Roger Morrison wrote:Analytic asks, I answer in bold:
Did he consciously decide to compromise on his temple covenants? RM: I doubt it. Did he forget he made them? RM: I doubt it. Does he not take them seriously? RM: I doubt it. Does anyone, really? Was he lying when he said the oath of office would be his highest promise to God? RM: I doubt it. Both "oaths" to the same "God". One would expect "Omni-God" will grant discretion in such matters??
Mitt is simply another huckster selling himself to a gullible undiscerning public, generally speaking. A nice guy, with wife-&-kids, and as pointed out above, a "bad-haircut". Represents the status que as well as anybody. Have to do with that until a real leader, with courage, emerges sometime in the future... As I see it... Roger
I meant to tell you that I really enjoyed your thoughts on this, Roger.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.