A simple request.

_Ray A · Post by **_Ray A** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:52 pm

Imwashingmypirate wrote:Who is Richard Dawkins? Isn't he an author?

He's an atheist who practices science. I think it would be fitting for atheists, instead of becoming God at 1,000 posts, to instead become "Richard Dawkins". ;)

Post by **_Imwashingmypirate** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:55 pm

Is he the dude that wrote the God dilusion? Or as in Dawkins that believed in evolution or am I just not thinking correctly?

Post by **_Imwashingmypirate** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:58 pm

P.S. how can one practice Science? Is he a scientologist? True science is fundamental and cannot be practices. It makes us up. And everything. It is perfect. One cannot possible practice science. That would be like me saying I practice Physics. Or I practice Maths. I cannot possible practice them but I abide by many of the fundamental and unknown laws of such things but do not practice them. i.e. I practice gravity by staying on the ground. It simply is not practicable.

_Ray A · Post by **_Ray A** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:59 pm

Imwashingmypirate wrote:Is he the dude that wrote the God dilusion? Or as in Dawkins that believed in evolution or am I just not thinking correctly?

He is indeed the dude who wrote The God Delusion.

_Ray A · Post by **_Ray A** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:01 pm

Imwashingmypirate wrote:P.S. how can one practice Science? Is he a scientologist? True science is fundamental and cannot be practices. It makes us up. And everything. It is perfect. One cannot possible practice science. That would be like me saying I practice Physics. Or I practice Maths. I cannot possible practice them but I abide by many of the fundamental and unknown laws of such things but do not practice them. I.e. I practice gravity by staying on the ground. It simply is not practicable.

I sometimes practice practical jokes. It was a tongue-in-cheek remark.

Post by **_Imwashingmypirate** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:02 pm

Ah. HAAAA LOL. Do you really believe in him? Why should he be higher than God? I think pure maths in its perfectness ought to be higher than God as God must also abode by the rules of maths whether it be abstract or day to day simple maths, more likely the former. For Dawkings is merely a man with Philosophical idea's.

Post by **_Imwashingmypirate** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:05 pm

Ah good ol' tongue in cheek. People don't get me when I am not being serious. I think that's because a huge percentage of communication (I think 3/4) is via body language and unfortunately we are communcating through a machine that has no body language and so we have to interpret by the methods and structures of others text.

Post by **_Pokatator** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:11 pm

Scottie wrote:Bond, go get some coffee man!!

Or go watch 2girls1cup again...:)

I prefer 1 girl and 2 cups, make em "D" cups.

I figure Bond is just trying to raise Pirate's post numbers, getting her closer to Godhood.

_Ray A · Post by **_Ray A** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:14 pm

Imwashingmypirate wrote:Do you really believe in him?

No, I'm atheist towards Dawkins. ;) (Payback)

Imwashingmypirate wrote:Why should he be higher than God?

Because there is no God, according to Dawkins.

Imwashingmypirate wrote:I think pure maths in its perfectness ought to be higher than God as God must also abode by the rules of maths whether it be abstract or day to day simple maths, more likely the former.

Then at 1,000 posts (or even now), you should request a mathematical sign. Do somthing unorthodox, like Tsuzuki on MADB. It breaks board monotony.

Post by **_Imwashingmypirate** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:15 pm

I am more than half way there. How cool is that. Jersey Girl we should arrange something like that elsewhere only not Mormon stuff. That would be cool.