Droopy wrote:1. Lot's of heterosexual males abuse woman and children, relative to the homosexual community, because homosexuality is a vanishingly small subset of the population.
2. Reisman's research shows that a fetish for young boys exists within male homosexuality that is substantially disproportionate to male homosexual's presence in the general population.
So? What's her point then?
3. What "rights" is she saying we should take away from "all' homosexuals?
I was talking about you. You're the one who started a thread about "the original Gay rights platform". Sorry if I thought it was a logical connection in the context of this thread. Silly me.
By the way, I didn't see anything about lesbians. Why is that?
Perhaps because the same preoccupation doesn't exist among lesbians, or perhaps because most homosexuals are, in fact, males homosexuals. Lesbianism is the minority phenomena here.
Then you're fine letting lesbians marry since they aren't a problem, right?
for what it's worth, I do not like the idea of homosexual marriage, but then I do not think it's the government's job to decide which sexual relationships are legitimate and which are not. The government should not concern itself with homosexual nor heterosexual marriage. It should only concern itself with protecting children within those relationships.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy. eritis sicut dii I support NCMO
You pulled something from 35+ years ago. Can you substantiate that this this is currently subscribed to by any group? If not, you can roll it up and smoke it.
As far as I know, all of it is, in one form or another.
Why don't you back that up with some authority, then. Things change over time, and I would imagine that the evil gay agenda has been modified over the years, as well.
I mean, c'mon: "As far as I know" - do you get the newsletter or something? Show some concrete references, or abandon the argument.
Still waiting. . .
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
I do not think it's the government's job to decide which sexual relationships are legitimate and which are not.
I assume then, that you do not support the recent California Supreme Court decision?
I can't speak of the context under which the ruling was made--I'm no expert in law. What I can state is that I wish California didn't have anything to do with marriage in the first place--it should have kept it at civil unions for anyone including incestuous civil unions which is something that gay rights advocates unfairly overlooks in my opinion. Actually, on that basis I disagree with the California ruling. They said it won't apply to incestuous marriages, but I see no logical reason it should not. The genetic argument against incestuous marriage doesn't hold because we allow others with genetic risks to marry. To me it is a huge flag indicating that this equality under the lawstuff is not true equality. It'd be somewhat like granting African-Americans equal rights but continuing to deny equal rights to women or Chinese-Americans or Latinos.
And no, I'm no fan of incestuous unions, but I don't think the government should put its nose in that buisness (except when it comes to underage children in incestuous relationships just as with underage children in any sexual relationship).
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy. eritis sicut dii I support NCMO
You pulled something from 35+ years ago. Can you substantiate that this this is currently subscribed to by any group? If not, you can roll it up and smoke it.
As far as I know, all of it is, in one form or another.
Why don't you back that up with some authority, then. Things change over time, and I would imagine that the evil gay agenda has been modified over the years, as well.
I mean, c'mon: "As far as I know" - do you get the newsletter or something? Show some concrete references, or abandon the argument.
Still waiting. . .
Man, I wish I could hold my breath that long.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy. eritis sicut dii I support NCMO
You pulled something from 35+ years ago. Can you substantiate that this this is currently subscribed to by any group? If not, you can roll it up and smoke it.
As far as I know, all of it is, in one form or another.
Why don't you back that up with some authority, then. Things change over time, and I would imagine that the evil gay agenda has been modified over the years, as well.
I mean, c'mon: "As far as I know" - do you get the newsletter or something? Show some concrete references, or abandon the argument.
Still waiting. . .
And I'm still waiting. What, this can't be supported?
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
