Dr. Jekyll Peterson and Mr. Hyde Peterson???

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Dr. Jekyll Peterson and Mr. Hyde Peterson???

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

harmony wrote:Well, if you didn't intend for the publication to come off like Seth obviously think it comes off, then you've got an even bigger problem than I thought. Because no matter what your intentions are, your publication isn't reflecting them. So maybe you should work on getting your publication in line with your intentions.

You base this verdict on the comments of one reader -- perhaps a careful, objective, and regular reader, perhaps not -- and on your quite uninformed declaration that his perception is "valid."

harmony wrote:Good grief, I feel like I've been holding a seminar on communication in customer service.

Let me put you at ease, then: You haven't.

We have, in fact, conducted subscriber surveys and the like, and we take their input quite seriously. Moreover, we hear from our subscribers very, very frequently.

We haven't just been sitting around waiting for the input of a nonreader such as yourself, invaluable though the opinions of the uninformed generally are.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Dr. Jekyll Peterson and Mr. Hyde Peterson???

Post by _harmony »

Daniel Peterson wrote:We haven't just been sitting around waiting for the input of a nonreader such as yourself, invaluable though the opinions of the uninformed generally are.


Well, since I didn't give you any input of my own (simply pointed out that Seth's input was valid... and from my limited reading of your publication, I think he's right), you have nothing to sneer at.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Dr. Jekyll Peterson and Mr. Hyde Peterson???

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

harmony wrote:you have nothing to sneer at.

I wasn't sneering.

But I don't think that your verdict of "valid" is worth the electrons it took to express it. (Had you ruled Sethbag's comment "invalid," I would have felt the same way about it.)

I'm headed into the mountains for the night. I'm hoping that beastie's book-free MMM thread will have added several more wholly insubstantial pages by the time I return. I'm counting on you guys!
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Dr. Jekyll Peterson and Mr. Hyde Peterson???

Post by _harmony »

Daniel Peterson wrote:I'm headed into the mountains for the night. I'm hoping that beastie's book-free MMM thread will have added several more wholly insubstantial pages by the time I return. I'm counting on you guys!


I'm off to dinner with my Sweet Pickle, and some furniture shopping. Have a great time in the mountains. We'll do our best to maintain our substantial integrity while you're gone.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Daniel Peterson wrote:I'm headed into the mountains for the night.


harmony wrote:I'm off to dinner with my Sweet Pickle, and some furniture shopping.


I went to a limited Magic: the Gathering tournament. I got my butt kicked.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Re:

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Daniel Peterson wrote:I'm headed into the mountains for the night.


harmony wrote:I'm off to dinner with my Sweet Pickle, and some furniture shopping.


I went to a limited Magic: the Gathering tournament. I got my butt kicked.


In the tournament, or by the jocks waiting outside? ;)
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

In the tournament. :-)

I'm far too old to be victimized by jocks.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_SUAS
_Emeritus
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:14 pm

Re: Dr. Jekyll Peterson and Mr. Hyde Peterson???

Post by _SUAS »

No one Messes with Mother Nature........Especially a WOMAN...WOMEN...Unless the mountains....Are white capped with sugar..powered sugar..the hills are alive with the sound of snoring.....
God has left the building and is staying at Motel 8
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Re: Dr. Jekyll Peterson and Mr. Hyde Peterson???

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Daniel Peterson wrote:We have, in fact, conducted subscriber surveys and the like, and we take their input quite seriously. Moreover, we hear from our subscribers very, very frequently.



Well, *that* is very interesting. I guess we would have to come to the conclusion that the typical FARMS Review reader demands articles which trash critics, ridicule their intelligence, and just generally attack them. Further, the fact that you get "tips" from your readers "very, very frequently" suggests that you are more about pandering to your "Sugar Daddies" than you are to scholarly excellence.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Dr. Jekyll Peterson and Mr. Hyde Peterson???

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Mister Scratch wrote:Well, *that* is very interesting. I guess we would have to come to the conclusion that the typical FARMS Review reader demands articles which trash critics, ridicule their intelligence, and just generally attack them. Further, the fact that you get "tips" from your readers "very, very frequently" suggests that you are more about pandering to your "Sugar Daddies" than you are to scholarly excellence.

Yes, Scartch, that is undoubtedly the conclusion that you would have to come to . . . being Scartch.
Post Reply