harmony wrote:Are there any churches that are not tax exempt? I mean... how big of a change would this really be? Huge? Small?
in my opinion to lose its tax exemption would be huge. Fist donations in all forms would not be tax deductible for the contributors. Next all donations would be taxable to the Church. Also, income earned on investments would be taxable as well. It would take about a 40% plus hit.
The more you talk Jason the more excited I get. I think I'll sacrifice a goat in order to push the dark pantheon to finally win and have teh exemption removed.
With luck, they will have to liquidate a few McTemples and turn them into gay bath houses.
And crawling on the planet's face Some insects called the human race Lost in time And lost in space...and meaning
I may just do that ..., then again, the Church is creating so much bad PR for itself that there may be no need.
You may be interested to know that the Form 990 that NFPs file has become more cumbersome and large. The information required is voluminous. The form is 11 pages with a potential for 16 attachments depending on how the filer answers certain questions. The instructions are over 200 pages long.
IRS wants to know what NFPs are up too and the pulse from congress is if you get special tax status then you better be ready to tell us what you are doing with your money. Details of compensation to officers, use of non cash contributions, dispositions of assets, dealings with related and "interested" parties and so on are all to be provided with much more detail than before.
Interestingly Church's are still not required to file this form.
harmony wrote:Are there any churches that are not tax exempt? I mean... how big of a change would this really be? Huge? Small?
in my opinion to lose its tax exemption would be huge. Fist donations in all forms would not be tax deductible for the contributors. Next all donations would be taxable to the Church. Also, income earned on investments would be taxable as well. It would take about a 40% plus hit.
If forced to choose one - a possibility one day; which would the Church forgo? Tax Exemption or Finance Disclosure? My guess Tax Exemption..
God has the right to create and to destroy, to make like and to kill. He can delegate this authority if he wishes to. I know that can be scary. Deal with it. Nehor.. Nov 08, 2010
TAK wrote:If forced to choose one - a possibility one day; which would the Church forgo? Tax Exemption or Finance Disclosure? My guess Tax Exemption..
I'd bet on tax exemption. I honestly consider that today's LDS equivalent of the 'Golden Calf.' Money is everything.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
RAJ wrote:As an aside, one of the talking points I heard from several LDS sources right after the election, was that the Church proper contributed NO money to the Yes on 8 campaign, except for a small, roughly $2000 travel contribution.
I remember this, too. Do you recall where you saw this?
TAK wrote:If forced to choose one - a possibility one day; which would the Church forgo? Tax Exemption or Finance Disclosure? My guess Tax Exemption..
I'd bet on tax exemption. I honestly consider that today's LDS equivalent of the 'Golden Calf.' Money is everything.
Yup .. the last thing the Lard's annointed want is a spot light on their activites .. That has not changed since Jos. Smith.
God has the right to create and to destroy, to make like and to kill. He can delegate this authority if he wishes to. I know that can be scary. Deal with it. Nehor.. Nov 08, 2010