Doctor Scratch wrote:1. Jskains was a gullible idiot and he bought into the FARMS authors' (esp. Louis Midgley's) assertions about the "Old Cash Nexus" and the silly and unsupportable claims about anti-Mormon ministries having a ton of money. For this to be true, though, it would mean that jskains had actually read through a whole article in FARMS Review, and since we know with virtual 100% certainty that he's never done such a thing, we can move on to conjecture 2, which is---
Huh. I suppose that
might have been the case. But, jskains has never struck me as the type to familiarize himself with Emperor Lou's
oeuvre.
More problematic still, however, is the suggestion that he would allow an anti-Mormon ministry to get ahold of such a domain name, when the right thing for an apologist to do would be to donate it to the LDS Church for
free. This is very mysterious. And, what exactly would motivate an anti-Mormon ministry to buy up a domain name that would only expose them further to the charge of being grossly prejudiced against Mormons? I should think they would avoid that trap altogether.
Doctor Scratch wrote:2. He was trying to bilk the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints out of money. I suppose he could claim that he was doing the Church a "favor" by snagging the domain name, but if his intent really was purely charitable, you would have expected him to hand over the domain for free to either the Church or something like the More Good Foundation. (Gee, if he'd done that, maybe we wouldn't have gotten the cold shoulder after trying to volunteer w/ FAIR.) And that's not what he was doing. His calculus w/r/t to the site was done based on the price of homes in the tony La Jolla, CA area. So one gets the impression that jskains wanted the Church to buy him a huge, ritzy house in La Jolla.
It does look that way. And what does that say about his assumptions concerning the LDS Church and its use of tithing funds? I mean, clearly he must believe that the LDS Church is accustomed to shoveling out wads of cash to those who really help the Church out, like, say, its apologists. Does jskains agree that some professional LDS apologists are paid handsomely for their work? It would seem that he must.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist