Ceeboo wrote: Whaaaaa t?
What what?
Or should I say, "What Whaaaaa t?"
Ceeboo wrote: Whaaaaa t?
Quasimodo wrote:Ok, Hoops. In your opinion, what would be less arrogant answers than A, B or C?
It's you that is putting forward a position based on personal religious beliefs. How are opinions based on an a disbelief more arrogant?
How would you feel if I were to claim you were arrogant for not taking my point of view. I'm not arguing about the existence of God (I just don't know). I'm just questioning various people's version of God.
I'm positive that I don't know anything about God. I'm pretty sure that no one else does, either.
I don't recall ever having done such a thing on this board or in this thread.It's you that is putting forward a position based on personal religious beliefs
I have no truck with opinions based on disbelief. The claim, however, invariably comes down to YOUR opinion that I/we are stupid for having beliefs. It gets tiresome. You offer no reasonable discourse to explore the question, you don't even bother, anymore, to put up a front that you might be interested in an adult conversation about it.How are opinions based on an a disbelief more arrogant?
I would disagree. And that's not what I'm talking about. It's not the contrary point of view, after all, I once had the same view. It's your view that reasonable, learned, rational, thinking people cannot have a different view. (here's where you may want to take your own advice and look up arrogant.How would you feel if I were to claim you were arrogant for not taking my point of view
Go ahead. Please do!! I would expect nothing less. Unfortunately, I get substantially less.I'm not arguing about the existence of God (I just don't know). I'm just questioning various people's version of God.
How can you possible know that? Oh, wait, belief in God is silly superstition, therefor, it's true on its face.I'm positive that I don't know anything about God. I'm pretty sure that no one else does, either.
What does it say about religion that it functions best in small doses?
Hoops wrote:
What does it say about religion that it functions best in small doses?
It doesn't. But to the extent your statement is true, it says the Christian faith is expressed in many divers ways. Which is what one would expect.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
The deeper people get into religious dogma and the religious lifestyle, the more extreme they get. That's where the fundamentalists are. Healthy religious people are those who can balance a secular life with a more moderated religious faith. Too much religion is bad for you.
Hoops wrote:It's you that is putting forward a position based on personal religious beliefs
I don't recall ever having done such a thing on this board or in this thread.
Hoops wrote:How are opinions based on an a disbelief more arrogant?
I have no truck with opinions based on disbelief. The claim, however, invariably comes down to YOUR opinion that I/we are stupid for having beliefs. It gets tiresome. You offer no reasonable discourse to explore the question, you don't even bother, anymore, to put up a front that you might be interested in an adult conversation about it.
Hoops wrote:
The deeper people get into religious dogma and the religious lifestyle, the more extreme they get. That's where the fundamentalists are. Healthy religious people are those who can balance a secular life with a more moderated religious faith. Too much religion is bad for you.
Wtf does this even mean?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
I don't recall ever having done such a thing on this board or in this thread.
I have no truck with opinions based on disbelief. The claim, however, invariably comes down to YOUR opinion that I/we are stupid for having beliefs. It gets tiresome. You offer no reasonable discourse to explore the question, you don't even bother, anymore, to put up a front that you might be interested in an adult conversation about it.
I would disagree. And that's not what I'm talking about. It's not the contrary point of view, after all, I once had the same view. It's your view that reasonable, learned, rational, thinking people cannot have a different view. (here's where you may want to take your own advice and look up arrogant.
Go ahead. Please do!! I would expect nothing less. Unfortunately, I get substantially less.
How can you possible know that? Oh, wait, belief in God is silly superstition, therefor, it's true on its face.