why me wrote: The masturbation threads usually have a single root to draw from. Yes, I do participate but only because they are so superficial. They need a reality check.
What kind of reality check? What are you doing to check reality?
The reality I see is that the Mormon youth (both boys and girls) are made to feel miserable. They experience self-loathing, self-hatred, and anxiety for having a body, for having sexual desire. It truely is not much different than feeling guilty about needing to eat or sleep. Not quite as bad but it is comparable. How is this kind of abuse superficial?
This looks like and inside joke. Can someone fill me in?
Hi Zelder,
It's a long story about "Mormon sex" where the participants do not actually have sex (penetration), but slide around each other. Light cotton undies on the girl will make this a more enjoyable experience.
"Why me" (a poster here) is often teased because he once (or twice) made comments about the virtues of "light cotton".
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
This looks like an inside joke. Can someone fill me in?
Here you go.
why me wrote: I thought the term Mormon lay was a common term. At least it was in NYC in the 70's. A Mormon lay can be dangerous because it can escalate into something else. And this is why it becomes important for the guy to keep his pants on and exercise control over the situation. Since I am a guy, I think that it is my responsiblilty And if I were a woman, I would think the same: it is my responsibility as a church member and as a woman. When both understand that no clothes come off, it can work out quite well and increase the expectation of the wedding night.
A Mormon lay gives the two people an opportunity to check out whether they are sexually compatible by seeing how the other would make love if it went all the way. The petting is a form of inner communication of sharing emotion and enjoyment of the other.
When I was young I knew that I could not bring down an active young Mormon woman. Best to show respect and leave the bishop out of it.
One more thing about a Mormon lay. It makes one an expert at foreplay. And that is not bad at all.
why me wrote:
Blixa wrote: Your porn research has served you well.
One more thing about a Mormon lay. When the man touches a woman with her clothes on, depending on the material, (it should be light cotton) it produces a good sensation on the woman's skin. She becomes excited and sexually heated. The man too shares in the excitement. But again, one must not lose control.
Such was Mormon life in NYC in the 70's.
You can read the whole thread here or you could do a search keyword cotton, author Why me, much creepyness will come up.
Now, my young friends, and I am sorry to say, many adults, how about all those of you who have a masturbation problem? If the names of those who had the problem were projected across this big, huge scroll, would your name be there, or would you be able to sit back confident and pure in heart?
And, in a few cases, what if we had the names of those who had a homosexual problem? What if their names were on this huge scroll? Their names removed, then what if we had those who are adulterers, who are serving in priesthood positions, unbeknownst to many, unbeknownst unto anyone except themselves and the partner in sin?
Again let us talk about a self-inflicting purging. My young friends, how about all of you who have committed fornication? Or have been involved in petting? Suppose their names were on this huge scroll, so that all may see. Now, I can tell you this, I bear my solemn witness that if you do not self-inflict a purging in your lives, the time may well come when there might not be a scroll, but it will be as though there were. It may be as though it had been shouted from the tops of houses. People cannot hide sin. You cannot mock God and hold the Lord's holy priesthood and pretend to propose that you are his servant.
I know of a great man who held his dead son in his arms, and said, "In the name of Jesus Christ and by the power and authority of the Holy Melchizedek Priesthood, I command you to live." And the dead boy opened up his eyes. This great brother could not have possibly done that had he been looking at a pornographic piece of material a few nights before or if he had been involved in any other transgression of that kind. The priesthood has to have a pure conduit to operate.
So, you masturbate or look at porn, and God is going to kill your son?
God: You have two choices. You can either never masturbate again, or I'm going to kill you.
Me: [long pause]
God: Well, I'm waiting. What's it going to be?
Me: I'm still thinking.
"Joseph Smith was called as a prophet, dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb" -South Park
Buffalo wrote:Another one I forgot, related to confessions. Bishops who ask for a creepy level of detail in the confession ("what color was your underwear?" "the underwear was how far down your thigh" etc).
Seriously?
EWWWWWWWW
Yes! I've confesed some things that I did with this girl and the bishop wanted to hear every detail. It really didn't make sense. Are they told to get the details?
Quasimodo wrote:I've noticed that why me is always participating in the masturbation discussions despite his objections. If he were Mormon, I might list him as one of the ten creepiest things about the church.
I have noticed this too! But then again I like to comment about it too. crap I'm messed up. This is creeping me out now.