From My Informant: The Perils of Socialcam

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_mms
_Emeritus
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:10 pm

Re: From My Informant: The Perils of Socialcam

Post by _mms »

I disagree with Dan often as it regards arguments related to the LDS Church. But I believe what Dan wrote about this. Seems reasonable enough to me. But I am also uncomfortable with the idea that anyone would use this to make a judgment on his character, honesty, apologetics, etc. The whole thing just kind of rubs me the wrong way (no pun). Although I believe, personally, that Dan has no regular desire to view this kind of thing, and believe his explanation fully, even if it were otherwise, so what? No doubt many here were once full believers who also liked J-Lo's ass. And that is inconsistent how?

edited to add: I should note, however, that I think the way the LDS Church treats men as it regards "porn" is pathetic and unrealistic and, candidly, ultimately harmful.
_degaston
_Emeritus
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 8:05 pm

I bear you my testimony that Pitbull is true

Post by _degaston »

He sure gets around in performing with lots of musicians. Not only has he done JLo but also her "til death do us part" buddy Marc Anthony, Neo and a bunch of other stars. I remember reading an article about JLo after Ben Affleck and how she and Marc were a forever couple and how good that felt (i.e. the Spirit) to see that she had finally settled down for good. by the way I heard a rumor that over 14 million of Pitbull's albums have been sold. Anyone getting more than 14 million numbers must be true ;)
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: From My Informant: The Perils of Socialcam

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Am I the only one who didn't know that "Pitbull" is a human being?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: From My Informant: The Perils of Socialcam

Post by _RockSlider »

Dr. Shades wrote:Am I the only one who didn't know that "Pitbull" is a human being?

and one with a boner no less! No shades ... that would make two of us
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: From My Informant: The Perils of Socialcam

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Dr. Shades wrote:Am I the only one who didn't know that "Pitbull" is a human being?


Did you research the video for... You know... Science?

- VRDRC
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_thews
_Emeritus
Posts: 3053
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:26 pm

Re: From My Informant: The Perils of Socialcam

Post by _thews »

liz3564 wrote:Actually, I can understand him saying something. Facebook is looked at by friends, colleagues, etc. If someone from BYU saw it, he could be in trouble from a job perspective.

I have a Facebook account, but don't use it that often. I can see how something like this could happen. If something like that had happened to me, I would be embarrassed, and would have likely said something. I have work colleagues who are friends of mine on Facebook, and that is something that I would be concerned about from just a common reputation standpoint.

Still, for what it's worth, Dan, if you are reading this here, I don't think it is that big of a deal. I am sure that your friends and colleagues know what type of person you are, and that this was a crazy mishap.

It does give one pause. I am going to have to monitor my Facebook account more carefully. It looks like we all should; it sounds like it is becoming a little "big brotherish".

The obligatory input from the "I'll back Dan at any cost" backseat cheerleader. Maybe Dan can speak for himself?
2 Tim 4:3 For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine.
2 Tim 4:4 They will turn their ears away from the truth & turn aside to myths
_Yoda

Re: From My Informant: The Perils of Socialcam

Post by _Yoda »

thews wrote:
liz3564 wrote:Actually, I can understand him saying something. Facebook is looked at by friends, colleagues, etc. If someone from BYU saw it, he could be in trouble from a job perspective.

I have a Facebook account, but don't use it that often. I can see how something like this could happen. If something like that had happened to me, I would be embarrassed, and would have likely said something. I have work colleagues who are friends of mine on Facebook, and that is something that I would be concerned about from just a common reputation standpoint.

Still, for what it's worth, Dan, if you are reading this here, I don't think it is that big of a deal. I am sure that your friends and colleagues know what type of person you are, and that this was a crazy mishap.

It does give one pause. I am going to have to monitor my Facebook account more carefully. It looks like we all should; it sounds like it is becoming a little "big brotherish".

The obligatory input from the "I'll back Dan at any cost" backseat cheerleader. Maybe Dan can speak for himself?

Actually, Dan already spoke for himself on Facebook. He is no longer a member of this community by his own choice. I am sure that if he chose to speak for himself here, he could do so. This is not a case of my "backing Dan at any cost" because I do not do that. There are things that I have disagreed with Dan on, and not backed him on. The issue as far as how he treated Eric comes to mind.

It is amazing to me that you are now choosing to pigeon hole me, and painting me with a certain brush simply because you have now chosen to attack me.

I have as much right to comment on this thread as anyone else. And, frankly, I was speaking as someone who also has a Facebook account and is unfamiliar with some of the apps involved like Socialcam.
_LDSToronto
_Emeritus
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:11 am

Re: From My Informant: The Perils of Socialcam

Post by _LDSToronto »

liz3564 wrote:Actually, Dan already spoke for himself on Facebook. He is no longer a member of this community by his own choice. I am sure that if he chose to speak for himself here, he could do so. This is not a case of my "backing Dan at any cost" because I do not do that. There are things that I have disagreed with Dan on, and not backed him on. The issue as far as how he treated Eric comes to mind.

It is amazing to me that you are now choosing to pigeon hole me, and painting me with a certain brush simply because you have now chosen to attack me.

I have as much right to comment on this thread as anyone else. And, frankly, I was speaking as someone who also has a Facebook account and is unfamiliar with some of the apps involved like Socialcam.


Of course you have a right to comment, liz. I'll admit, I had the same impression as thews. You do seem to jump to Dan's defence often.

H.
"Others cannot endure their own littleness unless they can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level."
~ Ernest Becker
"Whether you think of it as heavenly or as earthly, if you love life immortality is no consolation for death."
~ Simone de Beauvoir
_Yoda

Re: From My Informant: The Perils of Socialcam

Post by _Yoda »

LDSToronto wrote:
liz3564 wrote:Actually, Dan already spoke for himself on Facebook. He is no longer a member of this community by his own choice. I am sure that if he chose to speak for himself here, he could do so. This is not a case of my "backing Dan at any cost" because I do not do that. There are things that I have disagreed with Dan on, and not backed him on. The issue as far as how he treated Eric comes to mind.

It is amazing to me that you are now choosing to pigeon hole me, and painting me with a certain brush simply because you have now chosen to attack me.

I have as much right to comment on this thread as anyone else. And, frankly, I was speaking as someone who also has a Facebook account and is unfamiliar with some of the apps involved like Socialcam.


Of course you have a right to comment, liz. I'll admit, I had the same impression as thews. You do seem to jump to Dan's defence often.

H.

I call things the way I see them. If I feel that ANY of my friends are being mistreated, I am likely to come to their defense. Check my posts.
_3sheets2thewind
_Emeritus
Posts: 1451
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: From My Informant: The Perils of Socialcam

Post by _3sheets2thewind »

[quote="TrashcanMan79"]

(Moderator Note)in real life Picture and Facebook caption deleted.

elevenity-billion imaginary dollars to the person(s) who post this in other forums, double if you post it on MAD or a BYU forum.
Post Reply