Drifting wrote:Or Haiti...
i can think of a dozen places that need $5 billion spent on them more than downtown SLC. A hundred. A thousand!
Good grief! It is NOT the mission of the church to revitalize downtown Salt Lake City! Open the damn books!
Drifting wrote:Or Haiti...
harmony wrote:Drifting wrote:Or Haiti...
i can think of a dozen places that need $5 billion spent on them more than downtown Salt Lake City. A hundred. A thousand!
Good grief! It is NOT the mission of the church to revitalize downtown Salt Lake City! Open the damn books!
Chindo Khady cradles her dying son in her arms.
Two of her children have already died from malnutrition and she knows it will not be long until tiny, helpless Kinda joins them.
A drip dangles from his frail arm in a filthy, overcrowded hospital but for the seven-month-old baby, who at 11lbs weighs almost half of what he should, help has come too late.
Chindo Khady's son will become her third child to die in the drought that has hit west Africa
Waiting for death, Kinda lies in the filthy hospital with a drip attached to his fragile arm
He is a victim of the food crisis which is threatening 23 million people - almost a third of the population of Britain - in the Sahel region of West Africa within the next two months.
Severe drought, conflict and the decimation of crops by insects have combined to make the situation critical.
harmony wrote:Drifting wrote:Or Haiti...
i can think of a dozen places that need $5 billion spent on them more than downtown Salt Lake City. A hundred. A thousand!
Good grief! It is NOT the mission of the church to revitalize downtown Salt Lake City! Open the damn books!
harmony wrote:Why is downtown Salt Lake City the recipient of the church's $5 billion clean up campaign?
What's wrong with spending that money in Paris? Or Hong Kong? Or Rio? Or heck... my hometown???
Jason Bourne wrote:LDSToronto wrote:McMullin explains that City Creek exists to combat urban blight, not to fill church coffers. “Will there be a return?” he asks rhetorically. “Yes, but so modest that you would never have made such an investment—the real return comes in folks moving back downtown and the revitalization of businesses.” Pausing briefly, he adds with deliberation: “It’s for furthering the aim of the church to make, if you will, bad men good, and good men better.”
So shopping at Forever 21 and eating at the Cheesecake Factory makes us better men and women? Puuuhleease!
Oh and how about this:Asked about the $1.3 billion estimate of the church’s humanitarian efforts over the last quarter-century, LDS Church spokesman Michael Purdy writes in an e-mail, “Though the church’s monetary donations are significant, much of the ‘value’ of our service is not monetary, but in the hundreds of thousands of hours of service and the talent and expertise given by church members to help others around the world.”
So (outside of Fast Offering) the church has done little humanitarian aid comparatively to its overall income. But the real value is on the thousands of hours of service? Well did THE CHURCH really do the service? Nope. The members did and could do service without the church. Granted the church does encourage service but it does not do it. And how many of the hundreds of thousands of hours of service was serving in callings for the Church?
Kishkumen wrote:...
Obviously, I am missing something here. I am missing the value and good that this vast financial empire is doing for the world and for the members of the LDS Church.
Most of all, I find myself shaking my head at the fact that filthy lucre has apparently become the supreme deity. President George W. Bush taught me that shopping is a patriotic duty. Now the LDS Church is telling me that upscale shopping makes bad men good, and good men better, while its prophet performs the countdown to...
Sure, we can think about this in a more nuanced way, but should we even have to?
You can come down on me here as being little more than an anti-Mormon party pooper, but I find all of this genuinely concerning.
What happened to Zion? Zion is what inspired me as a missionary. It appears to me that its values have been turned on their head. Someone please help me make some sense out of this. When did "sufficient for our needs" become Tiffany & Co. and Porsche Design?
What am I missing here?
Chap wrote:Kishkumen wrote:...
Obviously, I am missing something here. I am missing the value and good that this vast financial empire is doing for the world and for the members of the LDS Church.
Most of all, I find myself shaking my head at the fact that filthy lucre has apparently become the supreme deity. President George W. Bush taught me that shopping is a patriotic duty. Now the LDS Church is telling me that upscale shopping makes bad men good, and good men better, while its prophet performs the countdown to...
Sure, we can think about this in a more nuanced way, but should we even have to?
You can come down on me here as being little more than an anti-Mormon party pooper, but I find all of this genuinely concerning.
What happened to Zion? Zion is what inspired me as a missionary. It appears to me that its values have been turned on their head. Someone please help me make some sense out of this. When did "sufficient for our needs" become Tiffany & Co. and Porsche Design?
What am I missing here?
What you are missing is two things:
1. You need to pray and read the scriptures more.
2. Stop ark steadying and remember that the church is guided by a living prophet.
After having read a lot of material contributed to message boards by TBMs, I really don't think there is much of a chance that you will get an answer essentially different from those.