No one would risk everything for sex!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

bcspace wrote:Premise doesn't match the subject at hand.


Right, because having sex behind your wife's back is okey-dokey when God tells you do to it. :rolleyes:

You're denying reality: Joseph Smith had sex with other women without his wife's knowledge. That is the issue at hand, and your lame denials ring rather hollow. It's sad that you are so quick to discard reason and morality to defend your prophet's sex life.

The church will always survive as long as there are useful idiots around to justify any action.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _Chap »

bcspace wrote:
BC: What seems to be the problem, Sister Arbuckle?
SA: Oh, Bishop Space, I am so ashamed of myself! I was tempted and had sex with a ward member.
BC: Which ward member?
SA [bursting into tears]: Brother Loblaw!


Premise doesn't match the subject at hand.


Hi bcspace. Hope you didn't miss this - looking forward to hearing your reaction (reposted):

=============
brade wrote:
bcspace wrote: ... But to prove that Joseph Smith did, I think you'll have to check the children seeing as how no other real evidence is forthcoming.


What do you understand of the testimonies in the Temple Lot case?


Chap wrote:
Yes indeed.

Links to this affair have been posted here so often, but here we are again. In a property dispute with the Reorganized Latter-day Saints in the 1890s, the Utah LDS church filed numerous affidavits from faithful Mormon women swearing that they had sexual relations with Joseph Smith. See for instance:

http://www.i4m.com/think/history/joseph_smith_sex.htm

Why would those women lie on oath? Why would the church have wanted them to lie?

Let's hear from bcspace.


Hello bcspace!!!
================
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Gaia
_Emeritus
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 6:02 pm

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _Gaia »

Tchild wrote:If the sex were good and the woman super seductively hot, I would probably risk a whole lot.

It's just a man thing.





GAIA:

Hey, it's NOT just "a man thing" --

If the man were super hot, compassionate but strong, a good provider and defender but also gentle and loving -- and had a hairy chest...... :lol: ...... Oh, sorry, forgot where i was for a moment.
Never mind.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _Themis »

Chap wrote:
Hello bcspace!!!
================


Trolls don't answer these kind of questions. That's all he has been for years now. I mostly ignore him and others like him now.
42
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

Themis wrote:Trolls don't answer these kind of questions. That's all he has been for years now. I mostly ignore him and others like him now.


Long-term trolls are fascinating. I would think you'd get tired of trolling after a few weeks, but he's still going.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Post Reply