TAK wrote:What a shame the Church spends hundreds of thousands of dollars pouring over European archives and copying names and birthdates in the name of Elijah but with the same equipment will not make copies of the thousands of pioneer diaries locked away never to see the light of day.
It is "poring."
And the Church makes donated journals available to researchers. At one time I was in the archives frequently asking for copies of donated journals and had no problem looking at every one I wanted. The Church did not ask me for proof of membership. Like most archives, they make copying difficult (the Utah State Archives is even more restrictive) but I was able to persuade them to let me copy what I wanted. I used my camera to take shots of the microfilms.
I have sitting on my shelf at home several copies of journals of ancestors which were recently copied and then typed up from Church Archives.
Rory's objections seem to be to the Church possessing the original and not, it seems, concealing it. But any lawful possessor of a journal can donate it to any archive. There is no law requiring all known ancestors to assent. A past will does not lawfully control the actions of a living person. I routinely see children bequested valuable art and jewels as heirlooms, with a request in the will to keep them in the family, only to see them sold at the first opportunity. Or real estate which is bequested outright with a similar will's request. A lawful owner has the right to sell or donate and it doesn't matter what the original bequester wanted. Nor does any archive ask the question: "Would your ancestor and all his descendants consent to this donation?"
One of my cousins received by will my grandmother's heirloom grand piano, something kept in the family for many years. Although there may be carping about selling it, none of the family could do anything about it. (Nor would one step forward to buy it.)
There's been a lot of law established on the point of trying to get a donation back. Generally, no can do.