All I’m asking for is a time stamp. Shouldn’t be hard.
I’m not calling anyone a liar. I’m asking for clarification because I did not hear what he apparently did.
I’d like to know exactly what he heard that made him think Jason Hansen had not seen the movie and was not planning on seeing it if he didn’t.
That’s not a large ‘ask’.
No.That is not a true statement. You are a liar.
I have made it clear that I watched the conversation between Jacob and Jeff. Jeff made it clear that he had not seen the movie called Heretic and was not planning on doing so. Jacob, to the best of my recollection, did not say either. In fact, throughout the conversation it sounded as though maybe he had seen it. He even pointed out that the movie seemingly had artistic merit and accurate portrayals in some instances.
It should not be a difficult thing for Rivendale to give a time stamp where Jacob says that he has not seen the movie and/or does not plan on seeing it.
Your memes and jpg creations do not make something true. It only points out your lack of awareness and seriousness.
I suggest you watch your own link, because clearly you haven’t. Yet again.
All I’m asking for is a time stamp. Shouldn’t be hard.
I’m not calling anyone a liar. I’m asking for clarification because I did not hear what he apparently did.
I’d like to know exactly what he heard that made him think Jason Hansen had not seen the movie and was not planning on seeing it if he didn’t.
That’s not a large ‘ask’.
Regards,
MG
How can there be a discussion about a film when at least one of the two participants hasn’t seen it, and the other one doesn’t say that he’s seen it, nor demonstrates a decent knowledge of it’s content?
It’s like you and I discussing the Book of Mormon when I state I haven’t read it, and you don’t declare having read it and demonstrate a lack of knowledge of its contents.
But let’s pretend for a minute that you have watched your own link. In your opinion what were the most compelling points about the content of the film Heretic that they made, which aren’t in the notes accompanying the video?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
All I’m asking for is a time stamp. Shouldn’t be hard.
I’m not calling anyone a liar. I’m asking for clarification because I did not hear what he apparently did.
I’d like to know exactly what he heard that made him think Jason Hansen had not seen the movie and was not planning on seeing it if he didn’t.
That’s not a large ‘ask’.
Regards,
MG
How can there be a discussion about a film when at least one of the two participants hasn’t seen it, and the other one doesn’t say that he’s seen it, nor demonstrates a decent knowledge of it’s content?
It’s like you and I discussing the Book of Mormon when I state I haven’t read it, and you don’t declare having read it and demonstrate a lack of knowledge of its contents.
But let’s pretend for a minute that you have watched your own link. In your opinion what were the most compelling points about the content of the film Heretic that they made, which aren’t in the notes accompanying the video?
Let’s wait to hear from Rivendale and go from there, shall we?
How can there be a discussion about a film when at least one of the two participants hasn’t seen it, and the other one doesn’t say that he’s seen it, nor demonstrates a decent knowledge of it’s content?
It’s like you and I discussing the Book of Mormon when I state I haven’t read it, and you don’t declare having read it and demonstrate a lack of knowledge of its contents.
But let’s pretend for a minute that you have watched your own link. In your opinion what were the most compelling points about the content of the film Heretic that they made, which aren’t in the notes accompanying the video?
Let’s wait to hear from Rivendale and go from there, shall we?
Time stamp.
Regards,
MG
Didn't think you’d watched it
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
You haven’t demonstrated that you have. So either you didn’t watch it, or you watched it and didn’t pay attention.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
You haven’t demonstrated that you have. So either you didn’t watch it, or you watched it and didn’t pay attention.
Time stamp.
Regards,
MG
You’ve not watched it.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
