Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Kishkumen »

Bret Ripley wrote:
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Was Mr. Peterson harassed on his tour by someone?
Other than Gerald Bradford, you mean. If I recall correctly, it was during this tour that Dr. Peterson received a particularly distressing message via e-mail.


Maybe Dan is working on a conspiracy theory involving Bradford and Everybody Wang Chung.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Bazooka »

Kishkumen wrote:Maybe Dan is working on a conspiracy theory involving Bradford and Everybody Wang Chung.


Actually, it would also have to include; John Dehlin; Dr Scratch; An unknown General Authority (or two); the whole of the Maxwell Institute (DCP admitted on Facebook that nobody from there speaks to him anymore); All of Mormon Discussions; Dr Jorgen; and on....and on....and on.....
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_malkie
_Emeritus
Posts: 2663
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:03 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _malkie »

Dr P could also have called the CoB, explained the situation, and asked if they would mind checking the list of tour participants against their records of serving Bishops.

That way there was no need to ask a Bishop to do him a favour. The person at CoB who received the request could then act on it, or not, according to the rules governing such requests.

I suspect that this scenario would have made for a good Bob Newhart-style phone conversation.
NOMinal member

Maksutov: "... if you give someone else the means to always push your buttons, you're lost."
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _harmony »

Bret Ripley wrote:
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Was Mr. Peterson harassed on his tour by someone?
Other than Gerald Bradford, you mean. If I recall correctly, it was during this tour that Dr. Peterson received a particularly distressing message via e-mail.


That's probably why it took so long for Everybody Wang Chung to float to the top. He was distracted about other things.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Kishkumen »

harmony wrote:That's probably why it took so long for Everybody Wang Chung to float to the top. He was distracted about other things.


So why bother after so long?
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _harmony »

Kishkumen wrote:
harmony wrote:That's probably why it took so long for Everybody Wang Chung to float to the top. He was distracted about other things.


So why bother after so long?


Exactly.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Kishkumen »

harmony wrote:Exactly.


Any ideas? I mean, it is one thing to say he was distracted at the time, but then that does not really explain why he is dredging up this business now. He might have just been satisfied that things did not go worse than they did at the time, bad as they were.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _harmony »

Kishkumen wrote:
harmony wrote:Exactly.


Any ideas? I mean, it is one thing to say he was distracted at the time, but then that does not really explain why he is dredging up this business now. He might have just been satisfied that things did not go worse than they did at the time, bad as they were.


I think he forgot about it, until he was reading somewhere and saw it. Then he wondered... and wondered. Sometimes that wondering stuff can cause all sorts of problems.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Bazooka »

I think it bothered him that John Dehlin and Gregory L. Smith had stepped into the limelight, pushing him into the shadows of obscurity. So he made a calculated post that he knew would attract attention.

He needed a drama, at which he was at the centre, to make sure he was Victim Number 1 still.
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Kishkumen »

harmony wrote:I think he forgot about it, until he was reading somewhere and saw it. Then he wondered... and wondered. Sometimes that wondering stuff can cause all sorts of problems.


LOL. It would have been best to drop it.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Post Reply