guy sajer wrote:
So, in essence, you are not talking about "churches" per se (that is, formal religious institutions with specified belief systems) but more about a person's inner beliefs, behaviors, morals, etc.
Do I have that correctly?
The problem I have with this is that it portrays a black and white, two-dimensional human morality; humans are much more morally complex than this.
What are the characteristics of those who belong to the Church of the Devil vs. those who belong to the Church of the Lamb? Perhaps if you described these we could see more clearly what you mean.
I think that is a correct restatement of what I think.
I will give some characteristics of the two "churches" so long as you understand that I know that God judges the heart of hte individual. Much of what would qualify a person for one or the other is not knowable to any mere mortal. God knows the heart, none of the rest of us have that ability. So for feelings and attitudes we can't see, we have to leave the judgement to God. We can observe outward behaviors. Those give us clues.
Those who hate, those who enjoy other people's pain (emotional or physical), those who selfishly take their own pleasure at the expense of others, those who molest, those who deny God, I think that is a list of the candidates for the church of the devil.
Those who love their fellow men, who serve them not for earthly rewards but just to serve, those who are kind, who do good works, who worship God (whatever their conception of God is) probably Church of the Lamb,