Prof. P Throws a Feeble Counterpunch

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

Some Schmo wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
Some Schmo wrote:I think Ray is gay. It would explain a lot, like his obsession with being an ass.


Homophobe :)


Do not misconstrue... I'm not afraid of homosexuals, nor do I dislike them.

I am, however, afraid of asses who expose themselves.


Stay away from donkeys then. They never wear pants.
_barrelomonkeys
_Emeritus
Posts: 3004
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:00 pm

Post by _barrelomonkeys »

Exposed asses aren't such a fright. Depends upon the exposer. What is this thread about?
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

Ray A wrote:
CaliforniaKid wrote:
What the hell?


The truth is stranger than fiction. My point is that no one knows anything about Scratch. And where were you, CK, when Scratch called DCP "corrupt" and "evil"? Cowering in your PC corner? Afraid to speak up against what you really know? Or do you think DCP is "corrupt" and "evil"?


I don't even read most of Scratch's posts. I certainly haven't read any where he called DCP corrupt and evil. But if I had, I probably wouldn't have said anything. Even if you had called him corrupt and evil, I wouldn't have said anything. But your homophobic insinuation that he must be some sort of scheming closet homosexual in order to think that the Church's treatment of Quinn was a load of bull**** is, in itself, a load of bull**** and calls for remonstrance.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

CaliforniaKid wrote:I don't even read most of Scratch's posts. I certainly haven't read any where he called DCP corrupt and evil. But if I had, I probably wouldn't have said anything. Even if you had called him corrupt and evil, I wouldn't have said anything. But your homophobic insinuation that he must be some sort of scheming closet homosexual in order to think that the Church's treatment of Quinn was a load of bull**** is, in itself, a load of bull**** and calls for remonstrance.


Scratch did call DCP corrupt, and a lot more. I'm looking for the quotes, and will produce them when I find them.

I would have no problem at all if Scratch was homosexual. I have no problem with Quinn, or the other gay Internet friends I have posted with on various boards, who have all been open about their sexuality. I do not have a problem with gay posters on MADB, either, and one is very open about his sexuality, and openly criticises the Church.

I have been interrogated with many questions, on many boards, and I've always tried to give honest answers about myself, and my personal beliefs, even when in "enemy territory". All Scratch has to do is clarify, and similarly answer questions, since he's the one always calling for CFR, and dismantling others' motives. HE has accused DCP of being homophobic by "gossipping" about Quinn, when DCP has explicitly denied this, which is backed by ALL of his FROB editorials since 1990, and also backed by a former poster who left this board after becoming disgusted at the false charges. He has never been obsessed with Quinn's sexuality, but Scratch is certainly obsessed with "exposing" DCP on false premises. His constant, unrelenting campaign to smear "The Good Professor" (used with ironic morbidity), should be opposed by all. Look at the OP on this thread. It's nothing more than another attempt at ridicule in the best Scratch "offender for a word" style.

I will find the quotes, but it may take a while, because when you look for "Mister Scratch" almost every thread contains something about "Daniel C. Peterson".
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by _Some Schmo »

Ray A wrote:
Some Schmo wrote:
Do not misconstrue... I'm not afraid of homosexuals, nor do I dislike them.


Too late, you've already "exposed" yourself as a homophobe. Posters get slammed for a lot less than correlating asses with gays, as if they don't have meaningful relationships.


Well, first of all, I don't care if you think I'm a homophobe. What difference does it make? The number of times in threads I've defended gay marriage and the gay life style in general likely speaks for itself, but quite frankly, people will believe whatever the hell they want about me, and it makes no difference to me unless I actually care about them.

Secondly, there are all kinds of gay people, just like there are all kinds of heterosexual people. There are those who are private and have meaningful relationships, and there are those that are just an exposed piece of ass ready for the humping. It was the latter I was metaphorically saying you were.

I thought I better be explicit here given your demonstrated level of reading comprehension.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Some Schmo wrote:
Well, first of all, I don't care if you think I'm a homophobe. What difference does it make? The number of times in threads I've defended gay marriage and the gay life style in general likely speaks for itself, but quite frankly, people will believe whatever the hell they want about me, and it makes no difference to me unless I actually care about them.

Secondly, there are all kinds of gay people, just like there are all kinds of heterosexual people. There are those who are private and have meaningful relationships, and there are those that are just an exposed piece of ass ready for the humping. It was the latter I was metaphorically saying you were.

I thought I better be explicit here given your demonstrated level of reading comprehension.


That's a very suave clarification. I suppose you'd place "ass-humping" gays with prostitutes. You obviously have "levels" of people who deserve shame, the "lower" they go, and at some point they deserve no humanity. A public toilet gay is comparable to an illiterate. Only "ass-humpers" can't read, and obviously never have meaningful relationships.
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

Because if Scratch is lying, or avoiding his real motives for attacking every and anything Mormon, then he's a complete SHAM. If, for example, he is really gay, but posing as a heterosexual, married and all that, but believes in the Church, and is SO cautious to hide his real identity - he could be anything! He knows, for example, that IF he is gay, none of his arguments would be taken seriously, and would be immediately dismissed by Mormons. But he wants credibility! And he can't do that by telling who he really is!

So let Scratch declare who he really is. His obsession with Mike Quinn, and gay issues, is one deadset give-away.




Well, we have a lot of poseurs here. People posing as educated, well read intellectuals, people posing as temple recommend holding Mormons with a fiery hatred of the Church, people posing as poseurs, everything and anything.

Scratch hides in defilade because he's afraid of something. I don't know what, but its fear that keeps him underground. We still have no rundown on his advanced degrees or where he got them. If I ever get a hold of them (and Harmony's Temple recommend), I'll be on the Bat phone to the SCMC in two NY seconds.

Scratch has two primary political obsessions: homosexuality and race. He uses both these issues as fall back clubs with which to beat anyone who takes principled exception to certain government policies and ideology.

So, as I always say, move on, nothing to see here...
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.


- Thomas S. Monson
_Yoda

Post by _Yoda »

This thread has been split. Discussions regarding Scratch's identity can continue here:

http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... 5124#95124

Please stay on topic with the OP for discussions here.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

liz3564 wrote:This thread has been split. Discussions regarding Scratch's identity can continue here:

http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... 5124#95124

Please stay on topic with the OP for discussions here.


Thank you, Liz.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by _Some Schmo »

Ray A wrote:
Some Schmo wrote:
Well, first of all, I don't care if you think I'm a homophobe. What difference does it make? The number of times in threads I've defended gay marriage and the gay life style in general likely speaks for itself, but quite frankly, people will believe whatever the hell they want about me, and it makes no difference to me unless I actually care about them.

Secondly, there are all kinds of gay people, just like there are all kinds of heterosexual people. There are those who are private and have meaningful relationships, and there are those that are just an exposed piece of ass ready for the humping. It was the latter I was metaphorically saying you were.

I thought I better be explicit here given your demonstrated level of reading comprehension.


That's a very suave clarification. I suppose you'd place "ass-humping" gays with prostitutes. You obviously have "levels" of people who deserve shame, the "lower" they go, and at some point they deserve no humanity. A public toilet gay is comparable to an illiterate. Only "ass-humpers" can't read, and obviously never have meaningful relationships.


Project much?
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
Post Reply