I am glad you popped in, Kevin.
Yea, I'm sure you're just thrilled.
This is the rule that you have not learned, yet. You can be critical without being rude, mocking, insulting, and crass.
That isn't a rule you idiot, it is a statement of fact. The rule over there is that rudeness won't be tolerated, but that is only in theory. In practice, what really counts as rudeness from a believer is hardly the same thing as that which comes from a critic. For example, believers can accuse critics of lying at the drop of a hat without the slightest worry about being reprimanded. But the second a critic even begins to
insinuate - not assert mind you, but merely insinuate - that a believer might have been disingenuous on
any level, out come the moderators tearing them a new butthole.
It is really hilarious to watch, but not nearly as hilarious as it is to see people like you so oblivious to the double-standard.
For instance, you could say that there is absolutely no scientific evidence that a First Vision ever occurred. That is miles away from saying that Joseph Smith was a crazy lunatic who had delusions.
But if an apologist accuses a critic of being delusional, there is no righteous indignation expressed by the trigger-happy mods.
You don't get it charity. You never did. You never will.
By the way Bob, I couldn't help but notice you removed your blog and all the discussions therein. They proved too embarassing huh?
“All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it...Propositions arrived at by purely logical means are completely empty as regards reality." - Albert Einstein