The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_rcrocket

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _rcrocket »

collegeterrace wrote:Huh, this coming from someone who QUIT and pulled his trailer out of Shady Acres a few months ago.


I have a busy schedule and have to be gone for long periods of time. What's wrong with you; can't you rise to the bait?
_collegeterrace
_Emeritus
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _collegeterrace »

rcrocket wrote:
collegeterrace wrote:Huh, this coming from someone who QUIT and pulled his trailer out of Shady Acres a few months ago.


I have a busy schedule and have to be gone for long periods of time.

Curelome dung.

Hey, by the way, why don't you have a siggy line?? I have one.
... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
_rcrocket

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _rcrocket »

collegeterrace wrote:Hey, by the way, why don't you have a siggy line?? I have one.


Dr. Shades has prohibited me from having one. I have been told that he denies signature lines to the best posters in defense of the Church.







x
_collegeterrace
_Emeritus
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 am

Re: Suggestion:

Post by _collegeterrace »

Imwashingmypirate wrote:I recommend youget a mod chat, that is a chatroom where mods can get together to discuss things. I have seen this before and can be very useful. You can have password protected rooms.
THERE ALREADY IS A CHAT ROOM FOR MODS. They are free to create a private channel or room in the current chat room software.
Imwashingmypirate wrote:Also, is there a clear list of the rules?
There was, it appears to still be in place but ignored.:

The Celestial Forum: The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.

The Terrestrial Forum: The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.

The Telestial Forum: The anything-goes forum for flaming, venting, and personal attacks. No moderation. Rated R.

Outer Darkness: The place where obvious spam and blatant derailments are consigned. Unrated.
... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
_collegeterrace
_Emeritus
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _collegeterrace »

rcrocket wrote:
collegeterrace wrote:Hey, by the way, why don't you have a siggy line?? I have one.


Dr. Shades has prohibited me from having one. I have been told that he denies signature lines to the best posters in defense of the Church.







x
It appears, just like your membership in LDS Inc, it best for you to keep denying the truth.
... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
_rcrocket

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _rcrocket »

Yes, I deny the truth that you are a complete moron. I hold to the fiction that you are a relative moron.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _moksha »

I continue to salute Dr. Shades in trying to make this a more appealing place to be. With time, even the most recalcitrant personal attackers will adapt to civilized behavior. Thank you new mods and Liz and Scottie for your diligence.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_solomarineris
_Emeritus
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:51 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _solomarineris »

Well shades,
All i can say is; it didn't take long before you guys start to chop posts left and right.
Way to go. So much for my naïve optimism.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _harmony »

solomarineris wrote:Well shades,
All i can say is; it didn't take long before you guys start to chop posts left and right.
Way to go. So much for my naïve optimism.


What do you mean by "chopped"?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Wow. I tried to get clarification on Old Testament rules, offered a bit of feedback and all of a sudden people realized this thread existed?

People. People.

The current moderating trends are an experiment with an end date and apparently there will be some sort of thread/discussion or whatever to discuss how it all went.

As for chopping posts. The mod team is trying out new ideas and techniques. Give 'em a flippin' break.

I'm with mok on this. I appreciate the effort.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply