What???????? Still here???

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_jskains
_Emeritus
Posts: 1748
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:06 pm

Re: What???????? Still here???

Post by _jskains »

No. I would not.
Great Spirits Have Always Encountered Violent Opposition from Mediocre Minds - Albert Einstein
_Simon Belmont

Re: What???????? Still here???

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Jskains, will you please leave the apologetics to the pros?
_jskains
_Emeritus
Posts: 1748
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:06 pm

Re: What???????? Still here???

Post by _jskains »

Simon Belmont wrote:Jskains, will you please leave the apologetics to the pros?


Who? You?

LOL

JMS
Great Spirits Have Always Encountered Violent Opposition from Mediocre Minds - Albert Einstein
_Simon Belmont

Re: What???????? Still here???

Post by _Simon Belmont »

We've been asked to, jskains

viewtopic.php?p=451734#p451734
_Everybody Wang Chung
_Emeritus
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:53 am

Re: What???????? Still here???

Post by _Everybody Wang Chung »

Simon Belmont wrote:Jskains, will you please leave the apologetics to the pros?


jskains wrote:Who? You?

LOL

JMS



Simon, jskains does have a good point. Might I suggest that both of you leave the world of apologetics together?
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
_jskains
_Emeritus
Posts: 1748
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:06 pm

Re: What???????? Still here???

Post by _jskains »

By a guy who has made embarrassingly anti-women comments and seems obsessed with one woman's boobs?

JMS
Great Spirits Have Always Encountered Violent Opposition from Mediocre Minds - Albert Einstein
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: What???????? Still here???

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Actually, I'm interested in hearing why Simon thinks that he's substantially different from jskains.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Simon Belmont

Re: What???????? Still here???

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Actually, I'm interested in hearing why Simon thinks that he's substantially different from jskains.


Where did I indicate that I thought I was "different" than jskains.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: What???????? Still here???

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

jskains wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:If the Church offered to buy it, would you sell? Or, better yet: if you were asked by one of the Brethren to donate the site, would you do it? Or would you demand your fair share of "lucre"?


If the LDS Church itself asked for the domain, I would gladly hand it over. IMHO that is God's organization and I do not profit off of God.

JMS


Still, your comments in this thread don't add up. You say, on the one hand, that you wanted to hold on to the domain name so as to keep it out of the hands of anti-Mormons, and yet, we have clear evidence that you tried to sell it for an enormous sum to an anti-Mormon. So, what's the truth here? Are you happy to help out the anti-Mormons so long as you're able to move into a huge house in La Jolla?
Last edited by Guest on Sun May 22, 2011 4:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: What???????? Still here???

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:Actually, I'm interested in hearing why Simon thinks that he's substantially different from jskains.


Where did I indicate that I thought I was "different" than jskains.


You clearly feel that you're in a position to judge him. Consider, for example, this:

Simon Belmont wrote:Another problem I have witnessed is the obvious knee-jerk hostility of members like your "jskains" and "Jersey Girl." If these specific posters can be dealt with on a case-by-case basis, perhaps the need for stricter moderation will be reduced. Just my two cents, having been an Internet message board denizen for many years.


viewtopic.php?f=1&t=14010&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=21

by the way: it sure is interesting to see this early admission that you have "been an Internet message board denizen for many years." That would certainly seem to clash with your claims about never posting on MAD/MDD, etc.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Post Reply