Bridgett Meyers: The Un-anti-Mormon

[_Droopy]

Pahoran called me a liar numerous times.

This nonsense about how people only respond to me in such ways because I initiated hostilities is a myth.

And now we see, yet again, why people level this assertion at you. You see, Kevin? This is why you invite the retaliation you receive.

[_Kevin Graham]

1. Just one semester of logic at one's local community college would do wonders.

It didn't for you.

[_Bond James Bond]

1. Just one semester of logic at one's local community college would do wonders.

It didn't for you.

To be fair he took remedial Poly Sci 101 Kev, not Logic. Still having trouble with that pesky political spectrum though.

[_Droopy]

Just for you Loran.

Good, this means I'll now get my own Will style dogpile thread, in which all members of the posse can contribute.

Do your worst, as its only a matter of time before you finally trip over your own shoelaces. You talk far, far too much, Kevin, but the vast majority of it is, as many can plainly see, despite its public nature, primarily for your own consumption.

[Guest]

As I said, I respond periodically over time with passion and aggressiveness, and I can and do use personal attacks now and then. I'm saying that the overwhelming majority of my posting history is an attempt at intellectual discourse,

Is that really true? Let's take a look at some samples of your first 10 or so posts as "Droopy":

1. Just one semester of logic at one's local community college would do wonders.

I should also have pointed out the obvious-and classic-incipient totalitarian mindset of the author. That which we have come to call "Liberalism" is, when the gloves come off, anything but.

Coggins7 is dead, long live Droopy.

This brings my username here into harmony with that used at the MAD boards.

You forgot, "or else...".

After Shades reset my name and password, I couldn't log in for a while. It took some time, but its been solved, as you can see.

In Cuba, the ACLU folks would be imprisoned or shot for being witless dupes. No one stupid enough to actually accept the rope from which they are to be hung deserve much respect in a system that worships at the alter of raw, unaccountable power. The right to lifers would be imprisoned or shot on general principles.

[SNIP!]

Mindless gibberish. What are you talking about?

I'm not sure you'd know what a free society is if your life depended upon that judgment Dude.

Can't you even try, Rollo, to debate an educated conservative with some degree of intellectual seriousness?

You have just crossed the line of no return. You have just thrown to the winds any credibility, of whatever human kind, you ever had.

Droopy is my favorite cartoon character of all time. Droopy is all, and all is Droopy. Droopy is the summum bonum of all WWII era cartoon characters.

There is an unpardonable sin, and you have just committed it.

Repentance will be hard for this one...

Oh, I thought he was about to lick some cupcakes...

I'm thinking that it's fair to say that this is a representative sampling of your posting, Droopy. So, the "periodically" and "now and then" in your post seem way off the mark.

What is this supposed to prove, Dr. Zin? A substantial portion of these aren't even ad hominems of any kind. I've been here since this board's inception, at ZLMB before that, and at MAD almost since it came online. What would be even more interesting are the hundreds of serious, intellectual substantive threads I've started in those years that were flung headlong of the tracks and into oblivion by intellectual poseurs such as yourself and Mr. Graham who have rarely if ever had any intention of serious analysis and discussion.

The Trailerpark has always seemed a bit overloaded with this type of interlocutor, but, or course, I'm sure that's just my own self delusion again.

[_Kevin Graham]

Just for you Loran.

Good, this means I'll now get my own Will style dogpile thread, in which all members of the posse can contribute.

Do your worst, as its only a matter of time before you finally trip over your own shoelaces. You talk far, far too much, Kevin, but the vast majority of it is, as many can plainly see, despite its public nature, primarily for your own consumption.

And that is what's so incredible. I do speak far, far too much, which means my enemies have plenty arguments for them to try refuting.

But they don't.

Ever.

Because they're not really interested in truth.

If I were to "trip over" myself or make some monumental mistake from speaking too much, one would think it would have happened by now. But it has been a half decade since my formal apostasy, and all I have done since is scare them away. Every once in a while Dan will get excited when he thinks I made a big mistake, and he'll start to pound on it to discredit me. (This, despite his regular insistence that he refuses to discuss anything with me) But then he ends up abandoning the debate quickly after I show his argument is flawed. Just look what happened last week at MAD. He got all excited because he thought his buddy's email would "set the record straight" and prove me wrong in some way. When that backfired, I was banned from the thread.

[_Doctor Scratch]

What is this supposed to prove, Dr. Zin? I've been here since this board's inception, at ZLMB before that, and at MAD almost since it came online. What would be even more interesting are the hundreds of serious, intellectual substantive threads I've started

My point, Droopy, is that these "hundreds of serious, intellectual substantive threads" don't exist. That's not what you do. If there are so many of them, how about you point us to 5 or 6 of them?

I'm sure that's just my own self delusion again.

If it's not a delusion, then you can post links to the threads.

[_MsJack]

But I am grateful for this thread. It reminded me to browse her blog, which I haven't in quite some time. I think I'll write something for it next week.

Just for you Loran.

Good, this means I'll now get my own Will style dogpile thread, in which all members of the posse can contribute.

Um, no. There will be no articles about Droopy at my blog. Besides, Doctor Scratch already did a post about Droopy at his blog. I thought the dogpile would never end!

But if Kevin wants to take up my old invitation to do a guest-post or two for me on a non-Droopy subject, he's welcome to. I've been pretty negligent of blogging as of late and could always use some more content.

[_Droopy]

Droopy is my favorite cartoon character of all time. Droopy is all, and all is Droopy. Droopy is the summum bonum of all WWII era cartoon characters.

I admit, this was really, really bad. So vile, so filthy, so mean and nasty is this wretched stream of blasphemous personal invective, that I will forthwith submit to public self criticism under the hands of commissar Scratch himself.

I will admit my counterrevolutionary tendencies...

[_Kevin Graham]

Jack, for what it's worth, I never said or implied I was planning to write an blog post about Droopy.

What the hell kind of blog post could that be anyway? LOL!

Droopy could only hope to be that important. I know the idea got him excited.