The answer is no. No hill is too small to die on.
Simon Belmont wrote:Darth J wrote:
Yes, if only I could see Todd Christofferson's facial expressions and hand gestures so I could pick up on his non-verbal cues. I bet that somehow that would have made this story less hilariously sexist and based on a misguided premise of letting this woman suffer for a year instead of the husband just doing the damn ironing himself.
Yeah, just like if the spouse who chooses to focus on her or his career gets sick or has surgery but has no accumulated vacation times should just insist that his or or her partner just go to work for her or him, right Darth J?
Shall I take your non-response to mean that you are abandoning your previous idea that I missed 70% of the message because I can't see non-verbal cues in the written word?
Was not the purported message of Christofferson's talk about being a man? Why can't a man just pick up the slack without needing to have his partner "insist" on it?
What's really sexist is you believing that the woman in the story is so weak and incapable that she is unable to do the ironing while in pain.
Otherwise known as, "the point of the damned story," which is the explicit reason why the husband bought the machine that does the ironing.
I commend this person for her strength and honor.
I know that the Congressional Medal of Honor is reserved for members of the armed forces, but maybe that could be expanded to include spouses who iron each other's clothes.
So instead of using every opportunity to blindly attack the church, you and your buddies here should think about what you're saying lest you expose your foolishness.
Hmm, let me ponder that.......yes, I'm pretty sure that what I am ridiculing is an unverifiable anecdote about a man knowingly allowing his wife to experience recurring physical pain for a year so he could save up to buy a machine that would spare him the indignity of having to iron his own clothes.