Aristotle Smith wrote:A friendly reminder to all. Please reconsider this plea and cease arguing with ldsfaqs, bcspace, why me, Droopy (when he shows up), etc.
Even if you manage to win a "debate" with them, it's the same as winning "Least Inbred Sumbitch" at an Appalachian family reunion. By winning, you have already lost.
Thank you for your consideration in these matters.
Aristotle Smith wrote:A friendly reminder to all. Please reconsider this plea and cease arguing with ldsfaqs, bcspace, why me, Droopy (when he shows up), etc.
Even if you manage to win a "debate" with them, it's the same as winning "Least Inbred Sumbitch" at an Appalachian family reunion. By winning, you have already lost.
Thank you for your consideration in these matters.
Another year passes.
I see your point, Aristotle, they will never change their point of view. They do provide a 'Dr. Watson" to our 'Sherlock Holmes", though and spur discussions.
When I think about putting them on ignore, I look to the bottom of the page and see how many 'guests' are logged on.
It's for those that lurk that I hope the inbreds don't go unanswered.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
