Blixa wrote:Sadly, my enthusiasm for carving out a Learning Annex here has been dampened by recent board developments. I'm not saying that useful and engaging threads and discussions won't pop up periodically, but I think the management sees this more as a place for entertainment purposes than education. C'est la vie!
Go ahead and carve out a Learning Annex. It doesn't matter how management sees this place; MormonDiscussions.com is all things to all people.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
I'm coming a bit late to this thread, but I'll still add my widower's mite. Blixa has taught me two, I suppose, "main things". 1. Ignore fools (yet I still don't use the ignore button; probably not here enough to even bother). 2. Mormonism has a rich history and culture, enough to make one feel to still claim it in some sense. It's not entirely the "apologists" who are to blame for this "either/or" approach to Mormonism, either. It's also those who egg them on by insisting that Mormonism can only be viewed in two senses: True or False.
RayAgostini wrote:I'm coming a bit late to this thread, but I'll still add my widower's mite. Blixa has taught me two, I suppose, "main things". 1. Ignore fools (yet I still don't use the ignore button; probably not here enough to even bother). 2. Mormonism has a rich history and culture, enough to make one feel to still claim it in some sense. It's not entirely the "apologists" who are to blame for this "either/or" approach to Mormonism, either. It's also those who egg them on by insisting that Mormonism can only be viewed in two senses: True or False.
Well said on both accounts, Ray.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
RayAgostini wrote:I'm coming a bit late to this thread, but I'll still add my widower's mite. Blixa has taught me two, I suppose, "main things". 1. Ignore fools (yet I still don't use the ignore button; probably not here enough to even bother). 2. Mormonism has a rich history and culture, enough to make one feel to still claim it in some sense. It's not entirely the "apologists" who are to blame for this "either/or" approach to Mormonism, either. It's also those who egg them on by insisting that Mormonism can only be viewed in two senses: True or False.
Well said, Ray. It's important to recognize the good in Mormonism, as well as the not-so-good.