What you're saying about Kevin can be proven to be empirically wrong,
No, it can't, unless he's a victim of an organic mental illness, which he's not. He's still a raving, narcissistic madman, which I could prove by mining the archives of MDD and this forum over the last several years, but my opinion of Graham - and opinion's are not actionable - is that he's unhinged, that is, he's a very wicked, destructive, and toxic person, but not insane.
In the normative sense of the word.
This won't help you, Scratch. You've made clear, empirical claims about my past - not my internal mental states - that are either true or not.
And, you claim to have received it from someone on this board who has intimate knowledge of my life since at least 16 years of age.
Let's bring that out into the open.
You've already shown that you approve of using legal threats in an effort to shut people up.
Oh yes, to shut people up you are lying about actual, historical events or conditions for the purpose of pubic defamation. Yes, in that case, I would seriously consider it. Otherwise, you can call me every name in the book. I could care less.
It must be nice to sit around day after day, ruminating on the various ways you might get revenge, with no need to go out and earn a paycheck.
It must be even nicer to throw bowling balls at passing cars from an overpass and then run away and hide when you see the impact. It must also be nice to lie and fabricate with impunity behind your screen name about people who are not protected by such.
