RockSlider wrote:I have only ever seen Shades’ act on two things:
1. A threat to the board (ok he let this slide with several until he made an example of one).
2. in real life violations.
Let me correct a misunderstanding: This board is a legal entity entirely separate from me. If someone threatens legal action against the board under the auspices of removing libelous material, I won't be affected in any way. I don't really even care. But when someone threatens legal action against me personally, especially due only to the fact that he or she dislikes the words of a third party over whom I have absolutely no control, then I must take action to keep bread in my children's mouths. Sorry if you don't concur.
Second, just like I reserve the right to delete material that could affect someone's employment, ecclesiastical standing, or marriage--see the recent DCP/Pitbull dust-up for one example--I also reserve the right to delete material that could get someone killed.