MsJack wrote:Pahoran wrote:You were at no time and in no sense a "victim,"
I'm not? So it's okay to post private correspondence without the permission of the other participants in the correspondence? You had no objections to
this?
Well, as the record shows,
you certainly didn't.
But then it wasn't your ox being gored, was it?
MsJack wrote:Pahoran wrote:and when it comes to "snarling tirades," you set the gold standard.
Grant your permission to post our correspondence from yesterday and let's see if the public agrees with you.
You keep nagging me about that. Let's just stipulate to the fact that
your public will take your side, of course; they don't need to read anything to do that.
MsJack wrote:Pahoran wrote:My good-will gesture was removing the quotes from my posts.
After (ab)using it to thrash me on a thread with hundreds of views where I was not permitted to respond. How magnanimous of you.
Why are you determined to relitigate every detail? If I remind you that you were a key figure in the Will Schryver poison pen campaign, will you then retort that he deserved it, and proceed to support it by producing some of his mined quotes? Just how far back is this supposed to go?
Once again: as soon as I saw your PM, I set about to do what any reasonable person would see was the right thing. I can't do anything about the time that has elapsed, but I am the one trying to bring this episode to an end; you are the one diligently trying to fan the flames.
Peacemaking is generally thought, especially among Christians, to be a good thing. Perhaps you've heard of it.
Regards,
Pahoran