1) choosing to leave one of the 13 symbols out of your analysis, which allowed you to conclude a 12 number result which you compared to a calendar; and
2) why you referenced Ifrah so much, but ultimately not one of your 'puns' matched anything he documented as a pun, even for the same numbers.
Thanks.
The only thing you'll get out of Ed1 is doubletalk and nonsense. Although his work may be interesting as Philo said, but it's complete and utter crap.
Ed1 wouldn't know an Egyptian king if one bit him on the nose. Ed1 is deluded and pushing garbage. His work is garbage.
You mean the nose of Anubis you obsess over was bit off? So that's what happened. Enlightening.
You are the worst Egyptologist want-to-be I've ever encountered. Your serious attempt in trying to convince others that the name Thutmose is written in the writing of Facsimile No. 3 only shows that your entire premise and foundation is:
CRACKPOT!
You have zero credibility and have lost on every front. You are a wolf in your Mormon fold and a clown on this board. You've lost.
It really shouldn't require a professional Egyptologist to state something this obvious, but with Mormon apologists around...
Mekis brings up Coenen's reconstruction of Hor's family tree, which is actually my favorite part of Ritner's book. I love that Coenen was able to piece together evidence scattered across the world to find out where and when Chandler's mummies and papyri came from. I suppose that's one benefit of the increased scrutiny that the Mormons have brought to the papyri.
