Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
-
- God
- Posts: 5905
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
Bednar didn't say his wife was worried he might "accidentally" hit her.
-
- God
- Posts: 4274
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
I would simply ask others to go back and look at the video being referred to. The 2:30 mark.Marcus wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2023 9:30 pmYou "playfully tease" in public settings that your wife is afraid you will hit her with a water bottle?MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2023 9:22 pm
And this is the culture we live in today. We can’t even playfully tease.
I can see where you are coming from, I think. A place where, and it is true, women have been ‘objects’ and a point of belittlement. I would be the last one to argue against that.
But c’mon, have a little grace. Think of context. Think of those involved. Try and understand that there is actually a time and a place for an innocent and playful gesture.
Sheesh.
I think this response clarifies your overly sensitive response at times on this board when others are playfully bantering back and forth and teasing.
My guess is that there are others here who are seeing your comments in regards to Bednar’s water bottle as being a bit over the top. But they probably won’t call you on it because you’ll accuse them as being sexist.
Things have gone way to far in this fractured society when we can’t do anything without being called out as being this or that.
Regards,
MG
You would like women to "have a little grace" about the "innocent and playful gesture" of telling an audience she is afraid you will hit her with a water bottle?
I am grateful that the culture i live in today doesn't include expecting women to gracefully acquisce when men would like to playfully tease them about how they are afraid of being hit by their spouse.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 07146.html
Make your own judgement..
Sheesh.
Don’t rely on the board nanny.
Regards,
MG
- Res Ipsa
- God
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
- Location: Playing Rabbits
Re: Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
Sorry, I misread.
He didn't in that answer, but that wasn't part of the question he was asked. I haven't scoured the published words of Mr. Bednar (and you can't make me! ), so I don't know. Given his belief that sex outside of marriage is contrary to God's laws, I suspect it would. Sort of by definition, anything that could lead a person to violate God's laws during our mortal existence would be a challenge in the flesh. His argument is, we all have them, but the nature of the challenge doesn't define us: only whether we obey God's laws.
he/him
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.
Benjamin Franklin
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.
Benjamin Franklin
-
- God
- Posts: 5905
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
Lol, nor me! I'm still traumatized by that 45 second video of him holding a young boy by force, in a full body clench from behind (to imitate satan's hold or something) in the middle of a roundtable discussion. The boy was visibly distraught, with tears running down his face. His parents were sitting in the circle, watching it happen.
in my opinion, Bednar doesn't have a good handle on appropriate public interactions.
- Res Ipsa
- God
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
- Location: Playing Rabbits
Re: Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
Can you answer my question? Analogies are based on some perceived commonality between two or more things. What did Bednar say SSA and "physical limitations" have in common? You don't have to guess, right. It's right there in the text you insist on leaving out.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2023 8:59 pmIt couldn’t be any clearer than this.We are sons and daughters of God and all of us have different challenges in the flesh. There are many different types of challenges. Would it be a challenge to be very beautiful or very handsome, and in the world in which we live, never develop deep character because we are able to open doors and have success just because of our physical appearance? And we become shallow and superficial in many aspects of our lives.
That can be a challenge in the flesh.
Some people have physical limitations: They may be born with a body that is not fully functional, or we may have an inclination to be attracted to those of the same sex.
Also note that everything before the comma is in third person, while what comes after the comma is in first. Note also that three almost identical pauses are punctuated with a colon, then a comma, then a period. The shift from third to first person is inconsistent with the interpretation you want to put on the words. A period in place of the comma may be truer to the speaker's meaning.
he/him
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.
Benjamin Franklin
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.
Benjamin Franklin
- Res Ipsa
- God
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
- Location: Playing Rabbits
Re: Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
Context is everything.
he/him
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.
Benjamin Franklin
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.
Benjamin Franklin
- Res Ipsa
- God
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
- Location: Playing Rabbits
Re: Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
OMG. I haven't seen that. It sounds... really uncomfortable.Marcus wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2023 9:59 pmLol, nor me! I'm still traumatized by that 45 second video of him holding a young boy by force, in a full body clench from behind (to imitate satan's hold or something) in the middle of a roundtable discussion. The boy was visibly distraught, with tears running down his face. His parents were sitting in the circle, watching it happen.
in my opinion, Bednar doesn't have a good handle on appropriate public interactions.
I haven't seen enough of him to judge, but the interaction you describe sounds pretty cringe.
he/him
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.
Benjamin Franklin
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.
Benjamin Franklin
-
- God
- Posts: 4274
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
Link?Marcus wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2023 9:59 pm
Lol, nor me! I'm still traumatized by that 45 second video of him holding a young boy by force, in a full body clench from behind (to imitate satan's hold or something) in the middle of a roundtable discussion. The boy was visibly distraught, with tears running down his face. His parents were sitting in the circle, watching it happen.
If it’s as cringe worthy as the water bottle incident that drives you crazy…I’m not too concerned. I guess I’d have to see what you’re referring to first though.
Regards,
MG
-
- God
- Posts: 5905
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
Yes, it was.Res Ipsa wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2023 10:02 pmOMG. I haven't seen that. It sounds... really uncomfortable.Marcus wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2023 9:59 pm
Lol, nor me! I'm still traumatized by that 45 second video of him holding a young boy by force, in a full body clench from behind (to imitate satan's hold or something) in the middle of a roundtable discussion. The boy was visibly distraught, with tears running down his face. His parents were sitting in the circle, watching it happen.
in my opinion, Bednar doesn't have a good handle on appropriate public interactions.
I haven't seen enough of him to judge, but the interaction you describe sounds pretty cringe.
-
- Savior (mortal ministry)
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Bednar claims the church is growing and vibrant
It couldn’t be any clearer than this.We are sons and daughters of God and all of us have different challenges in the flesh. There are many different types of challenges. Would it be a challenge to be very beautiful or very handsome, and in the world in which we live, never develop deep character because we are able to open doors and have success just because of our physical appearance? And we become shallow and superficial in many aspects of our lives.
That can be a challenge in the flesh.
Some people have physical limitations: They may be born with a body that is not fully functional, or we may have an inclination to be attracted to those of the same sex.
1. Eye witness testimony is notoriously unreliable. 2. The best evidence for The Book of Mormon is eye witness testimony, therefore… 3.The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is a type of evidence that is notoriously unreliable.