Page 45 of 84
Re: (Auto)biographical Dictionary of MDB/DM
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 5:43 am
by msnobody
Rosebud wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 2:31 am
To be fair, you’ll sell more copies if you allow me to speak.
You might also get sued and have to cope with the fact that John’s donors pay his attorney fees for him.
Food for thought.
With this comment of yours, this is where I’d draw the line and say no if it were my discussion board. Dr. Shades is way more lenient than I am. in my opinion, you have been in the past, and now, demonstrating irrationality and disruptive behavior on the discussion board. This is why they’d never allow me to be a moderator on here. In fact, you are derailing the discussion.
Re: (Auto)biographical Dictionary of MDB/DM
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 9:52 am
by Rosebud
msnobody wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 5:34 am
I’m sure everyone is welcome to participate. Could you leave out the John Dehlin rumination part as it has been discussed ad nauseum, or keep it to a minimum?
It’s impossible for me to leave John out because protecting myself from John’s retaliations through creating a record and communicating to John that the record he doesn’t want made is being made and time stamped regardless of his retaliations is the only reason I’ve ever posted here.
I have no other reason for being here and never would have posted here if it weren’t for John’s dishonesty and retaliations. There is nothing about this board and me that doesn’t have to do with John.
Why would I write about something else in my autobiography? I intentionally leave all other information about me off this board for privacy reasons. I’m not exactly trying to show anyone a -whole- person here.
But the reality is, Kish, that you can’t honestly tell this message board’s history and exclude me, yet you can’t really include me without facing retaliations.
And he likely will sue at this point…. and use his donors’ money to pay his legal fees while putting out fake “transparency” updates on his podcast feed.
It all feels different with that in mind, doesn’t it? With the fact that y’all could be hurt by him instead of just me?
I think his narcissistic angle with Jenn Kamp is going to be that it’s her fault he sued her and his donors had to pay $300,000 plus in legal fees because she didn’t pay the insurance bill while she was employed. He’s ridiculous.
Have you ever considered, msnobody, that I have found healing and that something more is going on here? (Food for thought) Since you don’t know me, there’s no reason to give me advice assuming you know me, right?
RFM and Washington State Bar Complaints
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:32 am
by Rosebud
https://youtu.be/b_mW40fFqyU
I don’t have the patience for RFM to listen to his podcasts or watch his YouTube videos, especially since he was so instrumental in helping John with the retaliations I used this board to keep at bay for so long.
But when I saw that someone else had reported him to the Washington State Bar on his YouTube feed, I felt I needed to add a third complaint to the stack.
I sent the form in yesterday.
I suppose you can podcast about it if you want, RFM, but in my opinion, you’re making yourself and the Washington Bar look really bad.
Re: RFM and Washington State Bar Complaints
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 2:37 pm
by drumdude
That’s unfortunate, because RFM did a fantastic job of explaining how bar complaints are not the place to voice your dislike of any particular lawyer. And the bar couldn’t care less that you think he’s a jerk.
Re: RFM and Washington State Bar Complaints
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 4:04 pm
by Dwight
At least I guess this will result in yet another entertaining episode smacking down abuse of bar complaints. As drumdude said you might have saved yourself a lot of trouble or at least better prepared your complaint if you took the time to listen.
Re: RFM and Washington State Bar Complaints
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 4:12 pm
by Shulem
Rosebud wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:32 am
I don’t have the patience for RFM to listen to his podcasts or watch his YouTube videos,
Or in other words you don't have the patience to collect and analyze the facts prior to another session of you bitching and complaining about what others might have to say.
Rosebud wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:32 am
especially since he was so instrumental in helping John with the retaliations I used this board to keep at bay for so long.
So you recognize RFM as instrumental and effective in what he does. Rosy-baby, ur out of your league. Hang it up. Go do something else more constructive with your life.
Rosebud wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:32 am
But when I saw that someone else had reported him to the Washington State Bar on his YouTube feed, I felt I needed to add a third complaint to the stack.
Well, we all know how you love to bitch and moan.
Rosebud wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:32 am
I sent the form in yesterday.
And since you confessed to not knowing the facts it must be concluded that your testimony is basically worthless.
Rosebud wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:32 am
I suppose you can podcast about it if you want, RFM, but in my opinion, you’re making yourself and the Washington Bar look really bad.
That's your opinion. I don't think the Washington Bar will agree with you.
Re: RFM and Washington State Bar Complaints
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 4:16 pm
by Failed Prophecy
Rosebud,
I'd like to congratulate you for being the simultaneously scarier yet paradoxically more boring version of Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction. Maybe Glenn Close as directed by George Romero? It's quite the accomplishment. Keep taking those bows, it will never get boring and people will never stop clapping.
Re: RFM and Washington State Bar Complaints
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 4:25 pm
by Res Ipsa
Crank files bar complaint. No film at 11:00.
Re: RFM and Washington State Bar Complaints
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 4:35 pm
by Marcus
Rosebud wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:32 am
...especially since he was so instrumental in helping John with the retaliations I used this board to keep at bay for so long...
Wow, I am curious as to how you "used this board" ?
As for throwing your complaint on the stack, you have a tendency to throw yourself into things without thinking.
Remember the GoFundMe you suddenly started for this board, because while long time members and participants were discussing how to handle a board situation you stepped in, announced you had the solution, and pre-emptively took it upon yourself to announce that your solution was the way we (the rest of the board) would be handling it? And then started a public gofundme??? That didn't age well, but you didn't seem to learn anything from it.
Under the circumstances, your statement that you 'used the board' shows the same impulsive immaturity.
Rosebud's Neverending story e: (Auto)biographical Dictionary of MDB/DM
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 4:48 pm
by Marcus
Rosebud wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 9:52 am
msnobody wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 5:34 am
I’m sure everyone is welcome to participate. Could you leave out the John Dehlin rumination part as it has been discussed ad nauseum, or keep it to a minimum?
It’s impossible for me to leave John out because protecting myself from John’s retaliations through creating a record and communicating to John that the record he doesn’t want made is being made and time stamped regardless of his retaliations is the only reason I’ve ever posted here.
I have no other reason for being here and never would have posted here if it weren’t for John’s dishonesty and retaliations. There is nothing about this board and me that doesn’t have to do with John.
Why would I write about something else in my autobiography? I intentionally leave all other information about me off this board for privacy reasons. I’m not exactly trying to show anyone a -whole- person here.
But the reality is, Kish, that you can’t honestly tell this message board’s history and exclude me, yet you can’t really include me without facing retaliations.
And he likely will sue at this point…. and use his donors’ money to pay his legal fees while putting out fake “transparency” updates on his podcast feed.
It all feels different with that in mind, doesn’t it? With the fact that y’all could be hurt by him instead of just me?
I think his narcissistic angle with Jenn Kamp is going to be that it’s her fault he sued her and his donors had to pay $300,000 plus in legal fees because she didn’t pay the insurance bill while she was employed. He’s ridiculous.
Have you ever considered, msnobody, that I have found healing and that something more is going on here? (Food for thought) Since you don’t know me, there’s no reason to give me advice assuming you know me, right?
Wow. The world just revolves around you, doesn't it? No one else has seemed to notice, so I don't think your bio will create quite the stir you think it will. Nor will it cause lawsuits and retaliation for the rest of the board.
Given creating such communities as the one found here seemed to be your focus originally, it is really too bad that you see no reason to participate here other than your fight with Dehlin. You have missed out on a great community.