Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _RockSlider »

MrStakhanovite wrote:
Stormy Waters wrote:Jersey Girl's statement seems odd to me.


It lacks context and was reproduced from a place we simply don't have access to. You’d probably need to read those 15 pages first before what she says makes any sense. My guess is that Stem posted to try and belittle Rockslider.


Jersey Girl was not really involved in this thread other than to take jabs at me because she was angry with me from other, non-related threads.

Come on stem, your coping posts now, bring down the whole 15 pages and let it be judged here.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Darth J »

stemelbow wrote:
I'm just saying it's cute you guys continue to maintain that he didn't lie. Cute indeed.


Please specify the names of any and all persons who are maintaining that Everybody Wang Chung didn't lie.

Incidentally, Stemelbow, the reason we know that Peterson's story about all this is true is because _________________________________________________.

P.S. "Continue to maintain" is redundant.
_Alter Idem
_Emeritus
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:24 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Alter Idem »

Thank you in keeping this thread bumped near the top and allowing us to drive this point home over and over again.


Yes, and the point that is being driven home is that this place is determined to find anything they can to harass Dan over and try to keep his attention on MDB and his detractors here.

Look guys, you all are very smart people and engaging, but this is just turning into a farce. You'll never concede, and I'm not going to (because I understand the purpose of the directory) so, we'll just have to disagree on this.
Every man is a moon and has a [dark] side which he turns toward nobody; you have to slip around behind if you want to see it. ---Mark Twain
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _stemelbow »

RockSlider wrote:Jersey Girl was not really involved in this thread other than to take jabs at me because she was angry with me from other, non-related threads.

Come on stem, your coping posts now, bring down the whole 15 pages and let it be judged here.


I'm just showing where she set it straight. I meant no offense, but you were the one who brought this all up by whining that you were constantly attacked over there. You know that's not even a little true.

It's true, Jersey Girl called you out a number of times. It's true you were very rude to her before she did. But it's not true she was not really involved int his thread. She posted on page one and many pages after that. She even commented on this particular little case in question, even though you say she didn't. Really...just let it go. No one there is about to say anything else about you, unless youcontinue to lie like you've been doing about us.

Sound fair?
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Darth J »

Alter Idem wrote:because I understand the purpose of the directory


And the language from the license agreement supporting a single thing you have said in this thread is ________________________________.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _stemelbow »

Darth J wrote:Incidentally, Stemelbow, the reason we know that Peterson's story about all this is true is because _________________________________________________.


Its true, you don't know. You simply keep claiming you know.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

stemelbow wrote:If you disagree then turn them in, you weenie..


I don't want to turn them in and if I did, I wouldn't have made a thread about it. My purpose here is to document DCP's antics as proof that this is the kind of stuff Mopologists do. This gives evidence to the claim that people want to stay anonymous because of activities just like this, it would be harder to find a clearer example for the purposes of an internet message board.

stemelbow wrote:No. We know you all still be pouting about how Dan said this or Dan did that, or some other such junk


Could you move on over to the thread about the Kevin Graham/DCP fallout? I'm defending your idol, but the usual suspects are not to be found.

stemelbow wrote: I'm just saying it's cute you guys continue to maintain that he didn't lie. Cute indeed.


I've never maintained that, I'm pretty confident he did lie. That confidence comes from DCP's rather candid post about his actions. Yes, I'm taking DCP's word over Everybody Wang Chung. Imagine that?
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Kishkumen »

Alter Idem wrote:Okay, if your paranoid scenario came true,

what would they report Everybody Wang Chung for?

"Hey, Salt Lake, this guy who was on my tour and is a Bishop might be the same guy who's been telling everyone he's a Bishop and saying mean things about me!!" :rolleyes:


No, he'd probably just use the information to try to push Everybody Wang Chung around. Mention every now and then how he knows who Everybody Wang Chung is, but he's a great guy for not revealing the information, although he could. And one day, if Everybody Wang Chung pushed it too far, he would find people using his real name in connection with the name of his employer on MDDB.

It's not like we haven't seen this schtick before. Some of us, in fact, have lived it.

The fact that you can't see this makes me wonder whether you have a selective memory, brain damage, or some other defect to explain this lapse in your cognition.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Stormy Waters

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Stormy Waters »

Alter Idem wrote:
There is no way in hell that if a bishops name had appeared on that list they wouldn't have followed through. They no doubt would have felt an 'obligation' to report Everybody Wang Chung to church authorities and to do that they would have needed confirmation.
Stop posturing just because the search failed to get the desired results.

But all of that is besides the point of this thread.


Okay, if your paranoid scenario came true,

what would they report Everybody Wang Chung for?

"Hey, Salt Lake, this guy who was on my tour and is a Bishop might be the same guy who's been telling everyone he's a Bishop and saying mean things about me!!" :rolleyes:


People say that they already knew he wasn't a bishop because of behavior inconsistent with a bishop.
Why not report him for said behavior if he actually were a bishop?

After all, that what the defenders keep on insisting we should do.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Kishkumen »

MrStakhanovite wrote:
stemelbow wrote: I'm just saying it's cute you guys continue to maintain that he didn't lie. Cute indeed.


I've never maintained that, I'm pretty confident he did lie. That confidence comes from DCP's rather candid post about his actions. Yes, I'm taking DCP's word over Everybody Wang Chung. Imagine that?


Yeah, I can't say that I have "maintained" much of anything about Everybody Wang Chung. I just know that DCP acted unethically in accessing Church records through his bishop friend to try to determine Everybody Wang Chung's in real life identity.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Post Reply