rcrocket wrote:I don't know about writing on both sides of the paper.
Just answer the question please.
I wouldn't be too concerned about having an evil disposition.
I've asked you for the evidence that I have one. I'm asking you again.
I am not here to defend MAD, but at least from a somewhat outside observer your fate was sealed when you back guns ablazin' after your three-day suspension.
In other words, you are here to defend MAD. I didn't come back 'all guns ablazin'', I simply continued the discussions I was already in.
Boy, that "rcrocket" really trounced you, didn't he?
On the contrary:
* He repeatedly failed to read my posts
* He had to be corrected by me several times because he was attributing to me arguments I had not made (and which I had said more than once I was not making)
* He failed to answer questions until prompted more than once
* He failed to answer some questions at all
* He supported three (actually four), of my seven points
* He tangled himself up by denouncing Bagley for relying on rumour, and then turned around and relied on a rumour which he had picked up from Bagley
All in all, it was a disappointing experience. I was expecting a challenge.