GoodK wrote:Anyone interested in speaking with Bishop Crockett about this further, can contact him at home at (661) 252-3167 or his office at (213) 485-1234
Down with anonymity!
I think Bob is also a very keen ultra-marathoner, and I take my hat off to his 100 mile runs. Very crucial additional information, in my opinion.
Once again, we have the anonymous smear. I was the one who brought GoodK's public humiliation of his then-dying sister and of his father to the attention of his father, who is a good friend. Smear me, you boor.
Yes, I recall that initial thread and its OP. Goodk thrashed, twisted, and fought hard on that hook but couldn't get free once the attack had been made. That thread received a great deal of attention. That thread alone could be used as a prime example of why I've always taken a psychological interest in the driving motivational forces behinds exmo and countermo polemics and attitudes.
Rc explained all of this (and didn't Daniel stop by for some verbal fisticuffs as well?), and yet, as usual, Scratch just plows on through the facts and continues to bang the same drum, while Goodk hides under the sheets hoping not to be noticed.
What "same drum"? The subject of this thread is the FARMS Membership "Upgrade." Tell me, Droop: Are you a card-carrying member of FARMS? Y/N?
rcrocket wrote:Once again, we have the anonymous smear. I was the one who brought GoodK's public humiliation of his then-dying sister and of his father to the attention of his father, who is a good friend.
I thought only DCP notified Father of GoodK? Did you both snitch?
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
rcrocket wrote:Dr. Peterson is innocent in this entire affair.
You have become delusional.
I urge you to be respectful in all your public discussions with people whose reputations have meaning.
I hope you're not referring to DCP's apologist "reputation" -- it has no meaning (or at least no credibility).
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)