Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

Post by _Jersey Girl »

collegeterrace wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Instead you all went on for 4 days, attempting to forward the idea that Daniel made an authentic death threat against Scratch, you used the word "kill" in your posts to describe it
Good GAWD Jersey Girl, are you that dense?

I used the word "KILL"??? No s_H_i_T Sherlock! Because it was in your Mormon idol's original post!

Here it is, please put on your trifocals and tip your head back to use the largest magnification:

Must kill Scartch. Blood. Violence. Delicious brutality. Guns. Knives. Bombs. Beautiful! Vengeance! Revenge!


For the record, I can stand Danny's posts much more than your posts.


Oh. My mistake. I should have said that you highlighted the word "kill" in order to substantiate a bogus death threat.

Better now?

Having said that...

There WAS no death threat. Are YOU that dense?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

Post by _Jersey Girl »

collegeterrace wrote:
Daniel Peterson wrote:Polygamy Porter's/collegeterrace's well-earned reputation for intellectual seriousness makes him a potent member of Master Scartch's A-team. His judgment is not to be taken lightly. His moral evaluations are weighty and consequential.

Which is why his formal complaint to Dr. Shades against me was such a grave matter. (He did complain to Dr. Shades, didn't he? Didn't he? You're kidding. Really?)

I did not.

I was merely pointing out the hypocrisy you demonstrate so well over here.


No, you weren't. You were whoring after him to exact an apology on behalf of Scratch from a seat on the bandwagon.

And this from your previous post:

For the record, I can stand Danny's posts much more than your posts.


What you can or cannot stand is of little interest to me. My only part in this thread or threads like it, is to call BS on Scratch and his sheeple (of which you are apparently one) when I see it because, as you so rightly pointed out, I'm not part of the herd and I never will be.

There WAS no death threat.

You followed the herd, jumped the bandwagon, you screwed up royally and your attempt at rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic doesn't change it.

That ship's gone down.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

collegeterrace wrote:I did not.

Which suggests that you don't really take the alleged "death threat" any more seriously than does Scartch the drama queen.
_collegeterrace
_Emeritus
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 am

Re: Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

Post by _collegeterrace »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
collegeterrace wrote:I did not.

Which suggests that you don't really take the alleged "death threat" any more seriously than does Scartch the drama queen.
Shades reads his board. You made the threat to Mister Scratch.

My point was the hypocrisy that you demonstrated.

What ever happened to being nice on discussion boards? Hmmm?
... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
collegeterrace wrote:I did not.

Which suggests that you don't really take the alleged "death threat" any more seriously than does Scartch the drama queen.


You know, Daniel...as much as I "idolize" you, were you to make a bonafide death threat against me in print, I'd rain law enforcement on you, Shades and anyone else who stood idly by and failed to report it, in a New York minute.

I just don't think saying "sorry" would cut it.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

Post by _Jersey Girl »

collegeterrace wrote:Shades reads his board. You made the threat to Mister Scratch.

My point was the hypocrisy that you demonstrated.

What ever happened to being nice on discussion boards? Hmmm?


Shades apparently didn't read the alleged "death threat" until I PM'd him and he thanked me for the heads up. You can read his evaluation and ruling on this very thread.

Need a link?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Jersey Girl wrote:You know, Daniel...as much as I "idolize" you, were you to make a bonafide death threat against me in print, I'd rain law enforcement on you, Shades and anyone else who stood idly by and failed to report it, in a New York minute.

I just don't think saying "sorry" would cut it.

You mean, there are limits to your devotion?

Heretic.

collegeterrace wrote:You made the threat to Mister Scratch.

Was that before or after I shot the last jackalope in northern Idaho?

collegeterrace wrote:My point was the hypocrisy that you demonstrated.

How, exactly, did I demonstrate this alleged "hypocrisy"?

collegeterrace wrote:What ever happened to being nice on discussion boards? Hmmm?

I can't spend all my time being nice on message boards.

Sometimes I have to be nice off message boards.

Sorry. There's only one of me to go around; I do the best that I can.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Dang, I failed to address this inquiry! I'm getting so sloppy.

Porter:
What ever happened to being nice on discussion boards? Hmmm?


Same thing that happened to ex-Mo's professed aversion to following a CON.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Ray A

Re: Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

Post by _Ray A »

collegeterrace wrote:
What ever happened to being nice on discussion boards? Hmmm?


Excerpts worth noting:

Dan Peterson, borrowing the title of a book by John Gordon Stackhouse, spoke on "Humble Apologetics." "And basically I am offering myself as the model of that," Peterson said, eliciting laughter from the crowd of about 300 people.


Some are critical of apologetics because they do not like the tone and method of the arguments. "And, hard as it is for me to say, I think we need to listen to them," Peterson said.

Peterson says apologetics are necessary, even quoting Neal A. Maxwell that critics should not be allowed any "uncontested slam dunks."

The audience of apologetic efforts isn't the anti-Mormon or the embittered ex-Mormon. "We have to understand the principal audience for our apologetic efforts is the people on the edge," Peterson said. "The people who are on the edge of leaving the church, the people who are on the edge of coming into the church."

These are the people who may rarely contribute to an online discussion, but watch it closely.


Peterson said that apologetics clears the ground so that the seed of faith can grow. He told of how his own father was baptized after reading some of Hugh Nibley's apologetic work. The Nibley books did not give him a testimony, but it did provide some of the "preparation of the ground."

But still, Peterson worries about the tone of discussions on Internet message boards. They are like boxing rings and are dominated too much by men. "There's a lot of, dare I say, a lot of testosterone involved with this kind of apologetics," he said.

He referred to an earlier FAIR conference presentation by Ronald Esplin in which Esplin said that apologists like to attack their enemies and historians like to take their enemies to lunch. "But, of course, what I really like to do is HAVE the enemy for lunch," he joked in an aside.


"We are winning souls, we hope -- not so much arguments," he said. "Winning an argument can lose you a soul."


Finally:

The Lord will not force people to believe what they do not want to be true.


Not always. Sometimes people want it to be true, but no matter how hard you try much of it just doesn't add up.

"Alice laughed: "There's no use trying," she said; "one can't believe impossible things."
"I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

Alice in Wonderland

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master - that's all."

Through the Looking Glass
_collegeterrace
_Emeritus
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 am

Re: Death Threats by DCP to Scratch

Post by _collegeterrace »

Ray A wrote:
Peterson said that apologetics clears the ground so that the seed of faith can grow.
ROFL, I missed that gem. Thanks for culling it out!

That is like clear cutting a grove of trees and then scraping the topsoil off and removing it to only leave hard dry clay! Any seed that falls there will dry out in the hot sun or be eaten by passing birds.

I do admit these boys have a tough job of defending the indefensible.

Defending magic with logic is a failed cause.
... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
Post Reply