What I've learned from apologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Here's my 2 cents on this deal and here it comes straight up.

First, I want to share that I've not seen so much convoluted crap come out of or hypothetically out of one person's keyboard, that would be Moniker.

Having said that...I don't think it wise, safe or fair to let the posts in question stand on this board. Whether or not I think someone generates an inordinate amount of convoluted crap is secondary to the safety and protection of that persons general well being.

The posts that reference mental states are unnecessary to determining who Bond was referring to as per krose's inquiry.

If we don't want to be discussing the mental state of Moniker (a continuance of previous discussions on this board which are now verboten) then the posts mentioning mental states should be deleted.

They are unnecessary.

The last three posts (Barrel O' Mangoes, bluebell and Bond) plus the fact that KA herself posted in this thread confirm that KA hasn't been banned and provide context enough to answer krose's question.

Do with the 2 cents what you all will. I'd like to see a determination on this by Shades. If the posts are deleted, I'd like this one deleted with them.

This is just totally flat out wrong.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Yoda

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Yoda »

OK, folks.

This is the edit I made:

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=8752&p=229990#p229990

I'm sure whatever I do will piss off somebody, and I no doubt forgot something....In any case, I'm going to bed.

If I missed something, feel free to PM me. Sorry. Too tired to think clearly.
_marg

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _marg »

It's much better Liz, except Harmony accuses M of lying..I think that should be deleted because M can not respond to that accusation.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

marg wrote:Harmony you are such a ding-bat.


At last! Something I can agree with! :lol:
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

marg wrote:It's much better Liz, except Harmony accuses M of lying..I think that should be deleted because M can not respond to that accusation.


Where do I accuse M (which M?) of lying?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_marg

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _marg »

harmony wrote:
Where do I accuse M (which M?) of lying?



You wrote: (Moderator Note) Quote has been removed. Liz

And while you are at it you should remove your comment about "the drama continues"


Better yet remove your entire post and as long as somewhere in the thread it's said K.a. did not get banned, Moniker was, that's all that's necessary.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _harmony »

marg wrote:
harmony wrote:
Where do I accuse M (which M?) of lying?



(Moderator Note) Non-MDB related post deleted by Liz


I can't help it if Bluebell is an astute poster and I agree with her.

And while you are at it you should remove your comment about "the drama continues"


No.

Better yet remove your entire post and as long as somewhere in the thread it's said K.a. did not get banned, Moniker was, that's all that's necessary.


No.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Jersey Girl »

The posts in question are a continuation of events that took place on this board which are now deemed off limits by Shades.

The poster in question is unable to respond to allegations of lying on this board.

They are banned.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_marg

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _marg »

Ok Harmony you asked where you accused M of lying, I pointed it out. It is irrelevant that someone else might think the same thing.

What it boils down to is that you've jumped to conclusions without adequate information, and you've taken it upon yourself to crap on Moniker.

She can not respond here, so quit crapping on her. Don't accuse her of lying, don't accuse her of creating drama, don't suggest that others should come here to discuss her.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: What I've learned from apologetics

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Just a note here: bluebell made no allegation of lying. She asked if she posted on an earlier thread.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply