Controversial article on Mormons and torture

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_JohnStuartMill
_Emeritus
Posts: 1630
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:12 pm

Re: Controversial article on Mormons and torture

Post by _JohnStuartMill »

For the record, I'm not categorically opposed to torture; I just doubt your philosophic acumen, and find your high-minded strutting hilarious.
"You clearly haven't read [Dawkins'] book." -Kevin Graham, 11/04/09
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Controversial article on Mormons and torture

Post by _Kishkumen »

Droopy wrote:If you actually have some philosophically substantive and logically coherent argument against waterboarding, why don't you state it, as opposed to the snarky stalling for time and bandwidth that is your modus operandi on most threads?


If I had started a thread on that particular topic, and actually wanted to discuss it with you, then we might proceed on that basis, but since I did not, and do not, then I feel no sense of obligation to discuss that topic with you.

I started this thread, Drippy, because I was interested in the charges that were being aimed at Mormons as particularly apt facilitators of torture. I did not post it to engage in a discussion of the definition of torture or whether torture was justifiable under particular circumstance.

That neither you nor your ideologically conjoined twin bcspace were able to divine this without me explicitly spelling it out for you suggests to me that whatever education you pretend to has yet to improve your reading comprehension skills. The same goes for your twin.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Controversial article on Mormons and torture

Post by _Droopy »

JohnStuartMill wrote:For the record, I'm not categorically opposed to torture; I just doubt your philosophic acumen, and find your high-minded strutting hilarious.


You are free to doubt it, but this may simply mean nothing more than that your understanding of what this means may be fairly limited.

"high-minded strutting"? Sorry if it appears that way. Its just that I have limited tolerance for poseurs and for those for whom a CNN town hall meeting passes for serious critical thought.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Controversial article on Mormons and torture

Post by _Droopy »

f I had started a thread on that particular topic, and actually wanted to discuss it with you, then we might proceed on that basis, but since I did not, and do not, then I feel no sense of obligation to discuss that topic with you.


White flag accepted...yet again.

I started this thread, Drippy, because I was interested in the charges that were being aimed at Mormons as particularly apt facilitators of torture.


What "torture"?

That neither you nor your ideologically conjoined twin bcspace were able to divine this without me explicitly spelling it out for you suggests to me that whatever education you pretend to has yet to improve your reading comprehension skills. The same goes for your twin.


As best I can see, all you've done is call names thus far.

We'll see.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Controversial article on Mormons and torture

Post by _Kishkumen »

Droopy wrote:White flag accepted...yet again.


Oh the wonderful fantasy world of Drippy's one-man, self-congratulation squad. Ignore reality. Congratulate yourself. Repeat as necessary.

Droopy wrote:What "torture"?


You don't have to settle that question to discuss the coupling of Mormons and torture. Think, Drippy, think. I bet even you can do it.

Droopy wrote:As best I can see, all you've done is call names thus far.


And you have yet to interpret the most basic English in this thread correctly. We shall see.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Controversial article on Mormons and torture

Post by _Droopy »

You don't have to settle that question to discuss the coupling of Mormons and torture. Think, Drippy, think. I bet even you can do it.


What our astute philosophical maestro has just asserted is that one does not have to define either the concept of torture, or whether torture, as defined, has even occurred, to couple Mormons to torture.

And Mr. Mill asks of me, why do I condescend...
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Controversial article on Mormons and torture

Post by _Droopy »

I read a wide variety of websites. Even if I didn't, though, CNN and NPR are actually reputable news organizations, unlike the conspiracy theorist haven that you get your Kool-Aid from.



This is knee slapping hilarious. NPR and...uh...CNN (???) haven't been reputable or trustworthy news organizations for decades (if CNN ever was).

Mr. Mill has now shown that he is simply not intellectually serious about the world or his own place in it.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Controversial article on Mormons and torture

Post by _Kishkumen »

Droopy wrote:What our astute philosophical maestro has just asserted is that one does not have to define either the concept of torture, or whether torture, as defined, has even occurred, to couple Mormons to torture.


Just when I think you couldn't get any stupider, you tell me that I am setting out to couple Mormons to torture. Earth to moron: I posted this article to discuss the author's argument that Mormons bear a special responsibility for and were particularly apt facilitators of torture.

If you weren't burdened by your own agenda and need to turn every conversation to it, then perhaps you would be able to catch onto this.

Droopy wrote:And Mr. Mill asks of me, why do I condescend...


Because it's your defensive mechanism when you look stupid.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Controversial article on Mormons and torture

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Hello there, Rev. Kishkumen. I'd like to take this opportunity to urge you to read Droopy's "philosophical" tract arguing in favor of torture. Basically, his argument is that we should def. torture suspects because:

1. It might be able to get information out of them
2. We have to think about other people out there who are getting hurt, tortured, or whatever else. It terms of "values", we can't just allow this one guy to sit there!
3. Not torturing means that we aren't acting, and thus we'll be complicit in whatever acts of terror might transpire.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Controversial article on Mormons and torture

Post by _Kishkumen »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Hello there, Rev. Kishkumen. I'd like to take this opportunity to urge you to read Droopy's "philosophical" tract arguing in favor of torture. Basically, his argument is that we should def. torture suspects because:

1. It might be able to get information out of them
2. We have to think about other people out there who are getting hurt, tortured, or whatever else. It terms of "values", we can't just allow this one guy to sit there!
3. Not torturing means that we aren't acting, and thus we'll be complicit in whatever acts of terror might transpire.


Good Doctor,

Thanks for directing my attention to Drippy's freshman thesis. I am afraid that he is demonstrating the very things the author of this article asserted: that Mormons are indeed apt facilitators of torture. Drippy seems to have no problem at all with torture. I mean, here I was posing the question of whether this author's contentions had any merit (Are Mormons ideal for framing and carrying out torture?) because I thought this was problematic at best, and Drippy seems hellbent on proving the guy right. Go figure.

Rev. Kishkumen
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Post Reply