PS: I hate defending Monson...but unless I'm missing something, I just see the uproar among non believers over Monson's error as playing into the hands of believers who view those of us who no longer believe as bitter, petty apostates...Benson's essay...lends support to this notion
your vision may be a bit cloudy on this one. i do not think benson's essay paints me or anyone on the same side of the Mormon spectrum as bitter or petty.
now, i only need to listen to monson's dooshy stories about once, and suffer his ridiculous condescending conference cadence for about 17 seconds, to know he is probably lying. or, to put it on monson's terms. to know that lies, were told. exaggerations, were shared. even fibs, were offered. and widows, even their names, even their childrens' names, were used, in vain. and heads, were left, shaking, at the end, of nearly every, conference talk, after monson's words, were spoken. because, nobody knew, the hell he was talking, about.
i am pretty sure i care about as much about tommy lying about the patton story in conference as i do about him lying about giving his trains to orphans on the streets of the salt lake city avenues when he was a wee lad. the details of the lies do not matter much to me either, craig. but the fact that this dude is a pathological headcase who has been lying and lying and lying and lying and lying about all these stories is relevant. pointing it out where specific records are available, and biographies are available, is actually kinda cool.
sure, it is not tommy lying about the general authorities never ever getting jiggy with patrons of the deseret gym back in the day. we are not talking about him lying for the lord in a cover-up like what happened with hofmann. after all, this is just another anecdote to move people and make them feel like they are getting a spiritual antidote.
to me, there is real meat to this story because tommy monson is such a lightweight and has been peddling this crap for so long. tommy has survived in chronological years to get where he is. but more than that, he has survived by being the reformed ron burgundy of church board members. think about it like this, during monson's tenure in the twelve/fifteen and many first presidencies, he has put up with some real damn characters. mcconkie, tanner, romney, packer, benson's crazy ass grandfather, among others. hell, he served with joseph fielding smith for 10 years. call them nuts or whatever, those cats were NOT lightweights. even hinckley was a money-laundering and building-building CEO. what is monson? a clown with a bunch of stories and nothing else. no muscle behind anything, just his stupid stories that are almost all false or embellished, and chiclets.
pointing at the naked emperor is really not a hugely intellectual endeavor. i think steve has gone way past normal research into a simple anecdote on this one. but i think the exclamation being made is one that will stick after monson's death, which is, an entire lifetime of so-called service and the leadership of a massive church and what does he have to show for it - children's books and a pack of lies. really, tommy has not much more than that to share.