The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mopologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mo

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Benjamin McGuire wrote:There was a paper written (and ready for publication). I reviewed it personally. I still have my correspondence with Will on this issue. I have never felt that I had the right to release this material.

I don't see why someone couldn't leak it, to, say, mormonleaks. This paper is important, and ought to see the light of day.

Having said that, getting direct access to these materials in the Church archive is not an easy process. Among other things, you have to sign a contract with regard to publication (when, and where, and to some extent what). When the MI refused to publish the article, the only way for the paper to get published was to

Let me stop you there. There's absolutely no one stopping anyone, much less Schryver, from publishing the paper on a blog, on this forum, or in some other medium.


Boy, this mysterious paper sure seems to just *snap* slip deeper and deeper into the earth. I mean, what happened? Anyone else remember this breathless coverage from DN:

https://www.deseretnews.com/article/700 ... rence.html

Greg Smith, one online commenter who had also seen the early version of Schryver's presentation, put it this way: "Schryver has, I think, pretty much killed, buried, and nailed the coffin shut on the idea the KEP are the 'translation documents' of the Book of Abraham, and then thrown the coffin into Mount Doom, before dropping Mt Doom under the continental plates."


Are we certain Mr. Mcguire isn't thinking of Schryver's presentation, and not a publishable paper? Dan Peterson, after all, said that he held the 2nd Watson Letter in his own hands; who's to say Mr. Mcguire similarly is misremembering seeing a paper by Schryver?

We're now going on 8 YEARS of this mystery paper never seeming to find the light of day.

- Doc
Last edited by Guest on Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mopologetics

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Ben:

Thanks very much for the clear and straightforward explanation: that makes a lot of sense. One wonders why no one came forward to say what you said all these past years. I guess that the old-school Mopologists would prefer to fuel rampant speculation, which also happens to make a lot of sense. In any case, I echo those who've said that they'd like to see the article find its way into print one of these days.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mopologetics

Post by _Kishkumen »

Yes, it is refreshing to see someone step forward with some facts regarding Will’s work instead of making vague gestures toward the possible existence of some document. It is also nice to see an intelligent LDS person stand up and say that the length of the papyrus scroll does not matter.

Thanks, Mr. McGuire!
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mo

Post by _Gadianton »

Thanks for the additional information Ben. I was struck most by this line:

"So he used a magnetic eddy current thickness gauge to measure the thickness of the papyri. His measurements - both in the width of the winding of the papyri"

I think one guy alone in a room with a ruler would be a prime target for confirmation bias, and then if using this thing goes beyond point and click, that just makes it worse.

I've sent a message to Dr. W in case he can weigh in on how these things work.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Mortal Man
_Emeritus
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:44 am

Re: The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mo

Post by _Mortal Man »

Craig Paxton wrote:Can anyone provide a link to the Cook and Smith paper? While I'm fairly certain that I've read their paper, I would like to revisit it. Was their work published in Sunstone? I do remember a refutation of the longer scroll being published in Sunstone many years ago. Any how a link would be nice if available.

Here’s the last published word on the subject: https://www.dialoguejournal.com/wp-cont ... 03_122.pdf
It all boils down to the winding lengths at the end of the paper. It should be noted that some of Baer’s measurements of the extant columns were high by a few centimeters. The original scroll was 120-126 cm.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mopologetics

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Ben:

I’m sure I’m not alone in being curious.... What is the backstory to Dr. Peterson’s apparently acrimonious feelings towards Brian Hauglid?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mopologetics

Post by _Shulem »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Ben:

I’m sure I’m not alone in being curious.... What is the backstory to Dr. Peterson’s apparently acrimonious feelings towards Brian Hauglid?


It's readily apparent that Brian Hauglid is not toeing the line but is out of step with what was once standard Mormon apologetics. Do you think he finds the white head atop the body of a black man in Facsimile No. 1 to be an acceptable form of Egyptian art? Apparently, John Gee, a notorious Mormon Egyptologist, has no problem with it.

What about you, Ben? Do you have a problem with a white man's head atop a black man's body? How do you feel about someone chopping the nose of a dog? You do realize, Joseph Smith was a butcher, do you not? Ben, do you like dogs? Would you help a dog in distress?
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mopologetics

Post by _Shulem »

Someone, anyone, please. His nose has been chopped off!

:surprised:

Benjamin, do you like dogs? Will you help this dog?

:cry:

Image
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mo

Post by _Gadianton »

Shulem,

Think back to the moments just before your psychological transition from an Uber TBM who believed the Gods numbered the particles of ink on facsimile 3, to the disbeliever who rejects every last jot of LDS teachings.

If someone would have asked you right at that moment before the transition from slug to butterfly, “Shulem, what is the name of the king?”

What is the name you would have given in response?
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: The Specter of the Book of Abraham Continues to Haunt Mo

Post by _DrW »

Gadianton wrote:Thanks for the additional information Ben. I was struck most by this line:

"So he used a magnetic eddy current thickness gauge to measure the thickness of the papyri. His measurements - both in the width of the winding of the papyri"

I think one guy alone in a room with a ruler would be a prime target for confirmation bias, and then if using this thing goes beyond point and click, that just makes it worse.

I've sent a message to Dr. W in case he can weigh in on how these things work.

Dean Robbers,

This post is in response to your request for a consult from the Physical Sciences Department (such as it is). Realizing that the following is more than anyone not working in the field would ever wish to know about eddy current devices (ECDs), I've marked the sections so one can read only what interests them.

As you clearly surmised, using a magnetic eddy current device of any description to directly determine the thickness of a non-conductive, non-magnetic material such as paper or papyrus (both dielectrics) would be quite an achievement. Papyri are neither magnetic or conductive, so it is difficult to see how such a device could be used as claimed. I have never heard of anything like this before and so went to the literature for a quick look.

Not only could I find no literature regarding the used of ECDs for direct thickness measurement of dielectrics alone, I cannot see why one would even attempt such a feat when there are several good contact methods for making such measurements. A good quality micrometer and a set of feeler gauge standards would be a great start.

That said, here are some of the applications for which eddy current devices (ECDs) are indispensable.

Eddy Current Separators used in Recycling: Eddy current equipment for physically separating non-ferrous metals (mainly aluminum cans) from ferrous metals and from non-metals such as paper and plastic are a mainstay of the recycling industry.

We consult for one of the largest recyclers of aluminum in North America and they use eddy current for separating shredded aluminum from all the dirt, paper and plastic packaging that rides along in the bales of crushed aluminum cans they receive for re-melting.

These separators are essentially conveyors with a rapidly rotating magnetic drum inside the endcap roller. The rotating magnet induces a current in the thin aluminum shreds as they approach the endcap roller. The induced electric current creates a magnetic field (Lenz's law) that opposes the field produced by the rotating drum. The resultant repulsive force kicks the aluminum particles upward and forward over a gate into a bin while the non-metallic material falls straight down by the force of gravity as it leaves the conveyor. The ferrous metals are attracted to the magnet and only fall off the conveyor belt when no longer in the magnetic field of the roller. Thus, these machines effectively separate non-ferrous, non-metallic, and ferrous materials into three separate bins, and can do so at a surprisingly rapid rate. (See the link below)

http://www.buntingeurope.com/magnetic_separation_and_metal_detection/magnetic_separation/eddy_current_separators.aspx

Eddy Current Devices for Non-Destructive Testing: ECDs of a different type are used to detect corrosion or fatigue cracking in non-ferrous metal structures such as aluminum aircraft components. These ECDs are comprised of a probe and coils that induce a circulating AC current (and resulting magnetic field) in the metal. The depth of penetration of the field is proportional to the frequency. Cracks or corrosion, on or beneath the surface, disturb the uniform flow of current and the differences show up in the induced voltage and phase of the AC signal in the probe.

https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/eddycurrenttesting/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbqzJ-hTtmQ

Eddy Current Devices to Determine the Thickness of Non-Conductive Coatings on Conductive Metals: Devices of similar design to the one described above are routinely used to determine the thickness of non conductive coatings on conductive metal surfaces.

Again an AC current is induced in the underlying metal by a set of coils and the strength of the field is determined by the probe. The distance between the induced current in the metal substrate and the tip of the probe affects the phase and the voltage induced in the probe and allows precise determination of the thickness of the non-conductive coating.

https://www.elcometer.com/en/coating-thickness-gauge.html

There are additional kinds of ECDs. Described above are three main industrial applications of which I am aware. All require that a conductor or conductive substrate be involved in the measurement. (See ETA below).

Back to our friend Bro. Schryver: I'm at a loss to understand what he claims to have done. Again, eddy current measurements require a conductive substrate of some type in which the eddy current can be induced. Sounds like miscommunication, wild imagination, or just plain nonsense to me. If Bro. Schryver has figured out a way to induce an eddy current in papyrus, it would be a more important discovery than anything he thinks he has turned up in Mormon history.
_____________

ETA: I suppose that one could use a ECD probe, place the papyrus on a smooth, uniform and preferably flat, metal surface, and then make some kind of thickness determination by pressing the probe against the papyrus and the papyrus against the metal surface. But why go to all the trouble when easier, more readily accepted, methods are available?

In any case, this would not be the intended use of the ECD. The use of standard measuring equipment, employing standard methods, that can be readily repeated by others is part and parcel of good science.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:48 pm, edited 3 times in total.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
Post Reply