Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologetics
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1451
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:28 pm
Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet
Liz might have me on ignore, so anyone else is free to repost my post asking Liz to about her current story vs what she posted a few days ago.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13392
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am
Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet
liz3564 wrote:Darth J wrote:
Gee, Liz. You started a whole thread about this, and you have gone on for pages about this. Kind of odd that it's when you paint yourself into a corner that you suddenly have more important things to do.
by the way, in your analogy, you are being Peterson's advocate, not a witness for him.
It seems your reading comprehension is slipping again, Darth. I didn't start this thread. Stak did.
Uh huh.
As far as my analogy goes...it's my analogy, not yours. You were playing Mr. Bigshot Attorney rattling off question after question, consistently trying to twist everything I was saying.
You are the one who compared yourself to a witness in court, so it is your analogy. And no, Liz, nobody is playing Mr. Bigshot anything. You keep making all these assertions that are not only inconsistent with each other, but ludicrous on their face. The failure to accept your increasingly silly apologia for this little cult of personality has nothing to do with whatever mindset you attribute to your interlocutors in this fantasy you have about "sides" of an "aisle."
It sounds like maybe things are slow at the law firm, Darth.
I'm not practicing law right now, Liz. Don't you remember how your friend Russell McGregor thought that was some big, scandalous secret he was holding over my head?
Personally, this is my Spring Break and I don't need that kind of BS.
Stemelbow told me you need to let go of the hostility and move on. Why do you hate non-believing Mormon folk, Liz?
I said what I wanted to say.
If you feel like there was a wrong committed, put up or shut up. Report it.
As far as the reason I'm leaving the thread....my son just got home from school, and spending time with him take far more precedence than spending time with you.
But you had time to post the above. Why didn't you have time to cite the language from the EULA that you assert supports bishops not only policing LDS members at large, but deciding for themselves whether something is or is not the official business of the Church at whose pleasure they serve?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:08 am
Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet
liz3564 wrote:However, my active posting days here are over.
liz3564 wrote:I'm stepping down from the witness stand, Darth. I have more important things to do today.
Color me skeptical.
"And the human knew the source of life, the woman of him, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, 'I have procreated a man with Yahweh.'" Gen. 4:1, interior quote translated by D. Bokovoy.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4085
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm
Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet
liz3564 wrote:I have more important things to do today.
Indeed. Defending the indefensible is such a waste of one's time.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13392
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am
Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet
Stormy Waters wrote:For those who approve of this behavior please state clearly what one can say before becoming eligible for this type of search.
Or is it simply that critics who post anonymously are fair game if they diclose information that makes them potetinally identifiable?
Because honestly if it's fair game to use church database this way. Whatever. The least you could do is own it though.
I would like to emphasize at this point that we're not a cult!
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 21663
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am
Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet
liz3564 wrote:Darth wrote:I will listen! I will happily listen to the following:
The official LDS church business that is within the scope of the duties of a ward bishop, for which Peterson's anonymous bishop friend accessed confidential member records, was ________________________________.
To confirm whether or not a fellow judge in Israel was making a mockery of the Church on a public forum.
Holy crap. Since when did Mr. Peterson become "the Church" to his acolytes?
Freakin' apostates.
- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:40 pm
Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet
I would like to join in.
Has anyone posted about this on mormondialogue? If so what was the outcome?
Has anyone posted about this on mormondialogue? If so what was the outcome?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4085
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm
Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet
MrKnowitsome wrote:I would like to join in.
Has anyone posted about this on mormondialogue? If so what was the outcome?
Welcome. Liz tried to start something other there a few days ago, but it died almost instantly. The silence on MAD has been deafening; perhaps posters there fear being banned for even mentioning Dan's screw-up (and we know they're all reading about it over here).
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:40 pm
Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet
It died or was it deleted? Do you have a link to it?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 6752
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am
Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet
MrKnowitsome wrote:I would like to join in.
Has anyone posted about this on mormondialogue? If so what was the outcome?
Feel free to lead the way there at MDDB MrKnowitsome, we, who are banned from there would love to follow the results.