You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
bill4long
God
Posts: 1182
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:56 am

Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

Post by bill4long »

Shulem wrote:
Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:26 am
I've been asking for years and years:

What's the king's name?

I will never stop asking.

:mrgreen:
Ed Gobel says it's Sesostris.

I know you guys like him because of the past but that's crazy loony.
Last edited by bill4long on Tue Jul 22, 2025 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This space for rent - cheap
Marcus
God
Posts: 7967
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

Post by Marcus »

I Have Questions wrote:
Mon Jul 21, 2025 5:33 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Mon Jul 21, 2025 4:19 pm
Not true. What I know differs from what you 'know'.

Regards,
MG
If it was in your favour you’d provide examples. You won’t, because you know what it will show if you did.
Exactly.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8273
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

Post by MG 2.0 »

Marcus wrote:
Tue Jul 22, 2025 5:26 am
I Have Questions wrote:
Mon Jul 21, 2025 5:33 pm
If it was in your favour you’d provide examples. You won’t, because you know what it will show if you did.
Exactly.
Not necessarily so.

Regards,
MG
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4051
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

Post by I Have Questions »

Marcus wrote:
Tue Jul 22, 2025 5:26 am
I Have Questions wrote:
Mon Jul 21, 2025 5:33 pm
If it was in your favour you’d provide examples. You won’t, because you know what it will show if you did.
Exactly.
Yep. That’s why he hasn’t been able to post an example to support his baseless and laughably incorrect assertion.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8273
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

Post by MG 2.0 »

I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Jul 22, 2025 10:55 pm
Marcus wrote:
Tue Jul 22, 2025 5:26 am
Exactly.
Yep. That’s why he hasn’t been able to post an example to support his baseless and laughably incorrect assertion.
Not interested. Digging up old dirt. Some folks make a living doing it. Let's let this go. It's not fair to others on the board.

Regards,
MG
Marcus
God
Posts: 7967
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

Post by Marcus »

I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Jul 22, 2025 10:55 pm
Marcus wrote:
Tue Jul 22, 2025 5:26 am
Exactly.
Yep. That’s why he hasn’t been able to post an example to support his baseless and laughably incorrect assertion.
Lots of waffling, no actual examples, and a desire to 'let bygones be bygones while continuing to behave exactly as badly as he always has. His current 'TTOC' use is a perfect example. He defines it in vastly different, even diametrically opposite ways, depending on whatever his current trolling activity needs it to mean.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8273
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

Post by MG 2.0 »

Marcus wrote:
Wed Jul 23, 2025 3:00 am
I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Jul 22, 2025 10:55 pm
Yep. That’s why he hasn’t been able to post an example to support his baseless and laughably incorrect assertion.
Lots of waffling, no actual examples, and a desire to 'let bygones be bygones while continuing to behave exactly as badly as he always has. His current 'TTOC' use is a perfect example. He defines it in vastly different, even diametrically opposite ways, depending on whatever his current trolling activity needs it to mean.
Oh, I know when to use TTOC.

Truth is, in regards to your desire to have me dig up the past and demonstrate that another poster was at times a mean SOB...no thanks. I wouldn't even know where to start searching old posts at this late date.

And to be honest I don't want to speak poorly of those that have passed on. Honest truth. Take it or leave it. Let bygones be bygones.

Regards,
MG
Marcus
God
Posts: 7967
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

Post by Marcus »

mentalgymnast wrote: ...me dig up the past and demonstrate that another poster was at times a mean SOB...no thanks. I wouldn't even know where to start searching old posts at this late date...
That's classic trolling-he still wants to trash another poster from long ago, but only by innuendo and vague name-calling, because he knows he can't prove it. Meanwhile, plenty of exact, quoted evidence has been given of his bad treatment of others.
mentalgymnast wrote: ...And to be honest I don't want to speak poorly of those that have passed on. Honest truth...
Right after he calls the person a 'mean son of a bitch.'. That's his intellectual dishonesty shining through.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4051
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

Post by I Have Questions »

Marcus wrote:
Wed Jul 23, 2025 6:54 am
mentalgymnast wrote: ...me dig up the past and demonstrate that another poster was at times a mean SOB...no thanks. I wouldn't even know where to start searching old posts at this late date...
That's classic trolling-he still wants to trash another poster from long ago, but only by innuendo and vague name-calling, because he knows he can't prove it. Meanwhile, plenty of exact, quoted evidence has been given of his bad treatment of others.
mentalgymnast wrote: ...And to be honest I don't want to speak poorly of those that have passed on. Honest truth...
Right after he calls the person a 'mean son of a bitch.'. That's his intellectual dishonesty shining through.
Yep. Classic trolling.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4051
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

Post by I Have Questions »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:21 am
If you folks were to be paid for your work here it would be a fairly healthy second income. :lol:

And you wouldn't have to pay tithing!

Step outside and breathe. Hug a child. Serve a neighbor. Take a drive. Read a good book. Have a real life conversation. Get off the dang keyboard!
Said the poster who is now at 6,128 posts.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Post Reply