Worst LDS talks ever

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Worst LDS talks ever

Post by _DarkHelmet »

DarthJ wrote:
You'll remember the story of the good Samaritan, and how instead of helping the guy who was lying right there in trouble at that moment, the good Samaritan went without lunches for a year so he could buy a camel for the guy to ride on.



LOL. The point Simon misses is not that the husband tried to help his wife, but that his solution was something Homer Simpson would come up with.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: Worst LDS talks ever

Post by _MsJack »

Simon Belmont wrote:It depends on thie audience. In a young women's meeting this would have been addressed the same way to young women.

I don't believe that.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_Yoda

Re: Worst LDS talks ever

Post by _Yoda »

Simon Belmont wrote:
EAllusion wrote:Hahaha. From 2006 no less.


Why is it funny that a husband wanted to make life easier for his loved ones? I don't get why you think this story is funny at all. You don't know the full situation of the family; could it possibly be that the husband and wife shared household duties and the husband wanted to make hers (no matter what they were) as easy as possible on her?

Sometimes your people literally make me sick to my stomach.


As Jack stated, it wasn't so much that the talk was poor. It was the fact that the talk, given in its present form, was not relatable to the average 21st century woman, or couple, for that matter. Most couples I associate with today are two income families. Both Mom and Dad work, and both Mom and Dad share the household chores. There is just really no other way to get everything done. Men helping with housework and cooking is far less unusual in today's society.

In the era that Elder Bednar was speaking of, that was clearly not the case. What really put things into perspective for me was hearing Harmony's story about her mother. All Elder Bednar would have had to have done to make the story more relatable would have been to explain the differences in what was valued, etc. in that era, the way that Harmony took the time to.

Jack has a very valid point. The brethren need to recognize that we ARE in a different era now, and they can't just assume that the vast differences in circumstances are going to be understood.
_Simon Belmont

Re: Worst LDS talks ever

Post by _Simon Belmont »

MsJack wrote:
Simon Belmont wrote:It depends on thie audience. In a young women's meeting this would have been addressed the same way to young women.

I don't believe that.


You're entitled to believe what you want, of course. But I am LDS and do believe that.
_keithb
_Emeritus
Posts: 607
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:09 am

Re: Worst LDS talks ever

Post by _keithb »

Darth J wrote:Dallin H. Oaks on divorce:

http://LDS.org/general-conference/2007/ ... e?lang=eng

"Nations that had no divorce law have adopted one, and most nations permitting divorces have made them easier to obtain. Unfortunately, under current no-fault divorce laws, it can be easier to sever a marriage relationship with an unwanted spouse than an employment relationship with an unwanted employee."

Some of the most hilariously disingenuous hyperbole I have ever seen is a former Utah Supreme Court justice actually saying that getting a divorce is easier than firing an at-will employee.

Generally, you don't need to file a petition and get a decree from a judge to fire an at-will employee.

"Some even refer to a first marriage as a “starter marriage,” like a small home one uses for a while before moving on."

That's an after-the-fact joke to help people cope with the loss after going through a divorce, you oblivious douchebag. In the hundred or so divorce cases I have done, I have never seen a single person say that they originally got married as an experiment.

"When a marriage is dead and beyond hope of resuscitation, it is needful to have a means to end it. I saw examples of this in the Philippines. Two days after their temple marriage, a husband deserted his young wife and has not been heard from for over 10 years. A married woman fled and obtained a divorce in another country, but her husband, who remained behind, is still married in the eyes of the Philippine law. Since there is no provision for divorce in that country, these innocent victims of desertion have no way to end their married status and go forward with their lives."

But you just said it was wrong to loosen divorce laws. Remember?

"I strongly urge you and those who advise you to face up to the reality that for most marriage problems, the remedy is not divorce but repentance. Often the cause is not incompatibility but selfishness. The first step is not separation but reformation."

If you say your prayers, your spouse will magically turn into a different person.

"Divorce is not an all-purpose solution, and it often creates long-term heartache."

As opposed to living out your life in a loveless, unfulfilling marriage, which creates happiness.

"There are many good Church members who have been divorced. I speak first to them. We know that many of you are innocent victims—members whose former spouses persistently betrayed sacred covenants or abandoned or refused to perform marriage responsibilities for an extended period. Members who have experienced such abuse have firsthand knowledge of circumstances worse than divorce."

But then:

"We know that children raised in a single-parent home after divorce have a much higher risk for drug and alcohol abuse, sexual promiscuity, poor school performance, and various kinds of victimization."

So, remember: there are many good Church members who have been divorced, whose kids will be alcoholic, drug-addicted sluts who flunk out of school. Thank goodness we can turn to our church leaders for comfort messages!

"To avoid so-called 'incompatibility,' they should be best friends, kind and considerate, sensitive to each other’s needs, always seeking to make each other happy. They should be partners in family finances, working together to regulate their desires for temporal things."

And while I'm at it, I'd like a pony for Christmas.

"If you are already descending into the low state of marriage-in-name-only, please join hands, kneel together, and prayerfully plead for help and the healing power of the Atonement. Your humble and united pleadings will bring you closer to the Lord and to each other and will help you in the hard climb back to marital harmony."


Unless, of course, religious differences are one of the problems. In such cases, the clear solution is that the spouse who isn't quite sure that Dallin H. Oaks is really an apostle of Jesus Christ just needs to get his or her s*** together.

"One study found 'no evidence that divorce or separation typically made adults happier than staying in an unhappy marriage. Two out of three unhappily married adults who avoided divorce reported being happily married five years later.'"

Of course, since "happiness" is a subjective, ephemeral concept, and since the couples who did not get divorced have no basis for comparison, it may be that the conclusions of this study are somewhat questionable.

"We cannot control and we are not responsible for the choices of others, even when they impact us so painfully. I am sure the Lord loves and blesses husbands and wives who lovingly try to help spouses struggling with such deep problems as pornography or other addictive behavior or with the long-term consequences of childhood abuse."

Remember: every divorced person is either addicted to pornography, addicted to drugs, or was molested or beaten as a child.

"In conclusion, I speak briefly to those contemplating marriage. The best way to avoid divorce from an unfaithful, abusive, or unsupportive spouse is to avoid marriage to such a person."

It is the brilliant, penetrating insights like this that tell me the Lord gives inspired counsel to our church leaders.


"If you wish to marry well, inquire well. Associations through “hanging out” or exchanging information on the Internet are not a sufficient basis for marriage."


This from a leader in a church that tells missionaries to commit people to baptism in the second discussion.

"There should be dating, followed by careful and thoughtful and thorough courtship. There should be ample opportunities to experience the prospective spouse’s behavior in a variety of circumstances."

You know, Elder Oaks, a lot of people have marital problems because they are not sexually compatible. What advice would you give to our members contemplating marriage to avoid such problems?


I remember when I was in the first year of my marriage, I was heavily contemplating divorce from my now ex-wife. I heard this talk in GC and SPECIFICALLY (I exaggerate not) stayed in a HORRIBLE marriage for another 3.5 years because of this talk.

Not only are talks like this one idiotic, but they can have real, negative consequences for the lives of those that listen to them.
"Joseph Smith was called as a prophet, dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb" -South Park
_Yoda

Re: Worst LDS talks ever

Post by _Yoda »

Simon Belmont wrote:
EAllusion wrote:Hahaha. From 2006 no less.


Why is it funny that a husband wanted to make life easier for his loved ones? I don't get why you think this story is funny at all. You don't know the full situation of the family; could it possibly be that the husband and wife shared household duties and the husband wanted to make hers (no matter what they were) as easy as possible on her?

Sometimes your people literally make me sick to my stomach.


Liz wrote:As Jack stated, it wasn't so much that the talk was poor. It was the fact that the talk, given in its present form, was not relatable to the average 21st century woman, or couple, for that matter. Most couples I associate with today are two income families. Both Mom and Dad work, and both Mom and Dad share the household chores. There is just really no other way to get everything done. Men helping with housework and cooking is far less unusual in today's society.

In the era that Elder Bednar was speaking of, that was clearly not the case. What really put things into perspective for me was hearing Harmony's story about her mother. All Elder Bednar would have had to have done to make the story more relatable would have been to explain the differences in what was valued, etc. in that era, the way that Harmony took the time to.

Jack has a very valid point. The brethren need to recognize that we ARE in a different era now, and they can't just assume that the vast differences in circumstances are going to be understood.


I thought I would add Harmony's actual post so that my words above have a little more context.

Harmony wrote:f the lady in the story was anything like my momma, she would not have welcomed the husband’s help by taking over the task no matter what. His assistance in buying a new machine that would make her task easier, yes, and she would have thanked him repeatedly for his kindness… but him actually taking over the task, as some had suggested? No. At least, not my momma. I can’t speak for the lady in the story.

When I was about 8, my mother managed to burn the bottoms of her feet so badly, she was ordered to stay in bed for 2 weeks. Daddy arranged for a neighbor girl to come in every day and do the cooking and housework. Momma was not a good patient. She had the neighbor girl set up the ironing board by the bed, so Momma could sit on the bed and still do the ironing.

I don’t think men today (and some women) understand how important it used to be (before permanent press and tumbling dryers) for the clothes to be ironed “just so”. Going out in a wrinkled shirt and pants reflected badly on the “Queen of the House”, and my momma was no different from her peers. She’d have been ashamed, had Daddy ironed his own shirts. Heck, she even ironed the handkerchiefs he blew his nose in, the sheets, and the curtains. I suspect the lady in the story and my momma would have understood each other well.
_Yoda

Re: Worst LDS talks ever

Post by _Yoda »

MsJack wrote:
Simon Belmont wrote:It depends on thie audience. In a young women's meeting this would have been addressed the same way to young women.

I don't believe that.


Simon wrote:You're entitled to believe what you want, of course. But I am LDS and do believe that.


Sorry, Simon. I'm LDS, and I'm with Jack on this one. I don't think it would be addressed the same way in a YW's meeting at all. Would it be refreshing if it were? Of course! But it wouldn't. Surely, you know that, too. ;-)

Now...I WILL say that over the past 10 years, in particular, I have seen the YW focus more on the importance of education. I have given several seminars at our local ward, geared especially for the YW. We discussed college preparation tools, such as how to write a top-notch college entrance essay, how to find and apply for various scholarships, etc.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Worst LDS talks ever

Post by _Themis »

keithb wrote:
Not only are talks like this one idiotic, but they can have real, negative consequences for the lives of those that listen to them.


You bring up an important issue. Members and leaders believe their leaders are called of God and what they say is Gods words to them. This is one of the more dangerous consequences of believing these kinds of things about our leaders. When terrible advice is given by leaders who in most cases have little knowledge about some of these issues a lot of negatives results come from them. It one of the better reasons people need to stand up and challenge false beliefs to avoid more bad advice that is taken as God words.
42
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Worst LDS talks ever

Post by _DarkHelmet »

How about Bednar's Parable of the Pickle classic. That one was bad, not because it was harmful, but just from a quality standpoint. It was just dumb. How did that talk get approved? Surely someone should have told him to come up with something better.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_Milesius
_Emeritus
Posts: 559
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:12 pm

Re: Worst LDS talks ever

Post by _Milesius »

Darth J wrote:Image


With the unwritten addendum: "Great. Now get back to ironing! Those shirts won't iron themselves and I don't want to have to show you that my pimp hand is way strong."
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei
Post Reply