Morley wrote:If one says "life is a bitch" it's not such a big deal. If I call a woman I'm conversing with "a bitch" it's understandably a big deal--even if I do it on a message board.
I think as far as message boards go, even that would be considered some what tame. The problem is he is LDS and that sort of behavior is frowned upon regardless of where it occurs.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
Carton wrote:.... I didn't understand that "bitch" was a forbidden word here, and although it's not very nice, I'm not sure I would say it qualifies as "vile". I've seen a lot worse on this and other message boards. Just sayin'. ....
If one says "life is a bitch" it's not such a big deal. If I call a woman I'm conversing with "a bitch" it's understandably a big deal--even if I do it on a message board.
One of my dogs is a bitch and I don't care who hears me say it.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
Have you considered that Schyver's theories have not been published because of the substance of what he has to say, and that he is using a self-imposed ad hominem to distract from alternative reasons of why he may not have been published?
After all, Schryver is the one who never ceases to remind everyone that this is an obscure message board that nobody cares about, which he continually designates as "The Great and Spacious Trailer Park" (a nod to his Christ-like compassion for the working poor). So if this board is so irrelevant and obscure, why would a thread here influence the decision of anyone to publish his methodologically-sound game-changer?
Is Schryver mistaken about the influence of this board, or is he mistaken as to why his theories are not being published?
Morley wrote:If one says "life is a bitch" it's not such a big deal. If I call a woman I'm conversing with "a bitch" it's understandably a big deal--even if I do it on a message board.
I think as far as message boards go, even that would be considered some what tame. The problem is he is LDS and that sort of behavior is frowned upon regardless of where it occurs.
Maybe so. But J. Golden Kimball was always my favorite Mormon.
"I do not want you to think that I am very righteous, for I am not." Joseph Smith (History of the Church 5:401)
Have you considered that Schyver's theories have not been published because of the substance of what he has to say, and that he is using a self-imposed ad hominem to distract from alternative reasons of why he may not have been published?
After all, Schryver is the one who never ceases to remind everyone that this is an obscure message board that nobody cares about, which he continually designates as "The Great and Spacious Trailer Park" (a nod to his Christ-like compassion for the working poor). So if this board is so irrelevant and obscure, why would a thread here influence the decision of anyone to publish his methodologically-sound game-changer?
Is Schryver mistaken about the influence of this board, or is he mistaken as to why his theories are not being published?
I have no idea! I was just going on what sock puppet had posted above about MsJack's thread:
It's an MDB classic that caused NAMIRS to pull back from being willing to publish Will's ground-breaking BoAbr theory paper, the one that was to deep-six the KEP and the problems it poses for the BoAbr.
If that's not really true, then talk to sock puppet. I was just replying to what his post had said-that it was the thread that caused NAMIRS to not publish the paper. That's what I thought was wrong to do. But if that's not what happened, then OK.
"I do not want you to think that I am very righteous, for I am not." Joseph Smith (History of the Church 5:401)
Darth J wrote:BUT HE'S THE ONE WHO SAYS THIS IS AN OBSCURE MESSAGE BOARD THAT NOBODY CARES ABOUT!!!!!
How can both of these things be true?????
You're making it sound like Schryver is just making s*** up about everything!!!!!!
jeez you're an idiot. It can be true that no one cares about this place and his posts on this place could have been the cause for Maxwell folks to not publish his paper. Its not literally "nobody". I mean you're a nobody but that's not to be taken literally, DJ.
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
Darth J wrote:BUT HE'S THE ONE WHO SAYS THIS IS AN OBSCURE MESSAGE BOARD THAT NOBODY CARES ABOUT!!!!!
How can both of these things be true?????
You're making it sound like Schryver is just making s*** up about everything!!!!!!
jeez you're an idiot. It can be true that no one cares about this place and his posts on this place could have been the cause for Maxwell folks to not publish his paper. Its not literally "nobody". I mean you're a nobody but that's not to be taken literally, DJ.
I think it's unlikely, Stem, that Maxwell would put much weight on Will's posts here. I'm pretty sure it had to do with the quality of his work or the fear of ridicule.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.