Yahoo Bot wrote: Perhaps you have not been all that observant on that other Board, but Pahoran has routinely condemned me as being in league with the apostates.
Pahoran is an equal opportunity condemnor.
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
Fence Sitter wrote:Both parties are anonymous. And criticizing Everybody Wang Chung for mocking while ignoring Pahorong's behavior is hypocritical.
I have seen you criticize both sides for anonymity.
Not quite. Pahoran's identity is well-known by most experienced posters here and there.
Bishop Chung's boorish behavior reminds me of the Michael Scott character in The Office, constantly belittling Toby for his divorced status.
Perhaps you have not been all that observant on that other Board, but Pahoran has routinely condemned me as being in league with the apostates.
There are a number of posters here who know my identity also, would that excuse bad behavior on my part?
I do not condone mocking someone about their personal life, but certainly Pahoran's behavior and anonymity rise to the same level (or above) Everybody Wang Chung's.
I have noted, and admired, the stance, you have taken on DCP's firing on the other board, in fact it is because you have been consistent in calling out anonymous behavior that I noted your lack of doing so here with Pahoran.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
Fence Sitter wrote: I have noted, and admired, the stance, you have taken on DCP's firing on the other board, in fact it is because you have been consistent in calling out anonymous behavior that I noted your lack of doing so here with Pahoran.
Because I know exactly who he is. He can be sued for his behavior.
I frankly don't understand why people can't tell the difference between a pseudonym and an anonynym (if there is such a word). I use a pseudonym here. But you all know who I am.
Yahoo Bot wrote: Because I know exactly who he is. He can be sued for his behavior.
I frankly don't understand why people can't tell the difference between a pseudonym and an anonynym (if there is such a word). I use a pseudonym here. But you all know who I am.
Your distinction between a pseudonym and an anonynym applies to you not Pahoran. I know you do not care when people use your real name, such is not the case for Pahoran, either on this board or the other.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
Fence Sitter wrote:Your distinction between a pseudonym and an anonynym applies to you not Pahoran. I know you do not care when people use your real name, such is not the case for Pahoran, either on this board or the other.
I know who you are, and you know who I am. That I choose not to give my in real life identity to those I believe might harm me or my family means I am being prudent, not evil.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS
"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Simply splendid. As someone who has been happily married for 22 years, it is something I live by. I hope you not only quote it, but meditate therein day and night.
Now, would you like to take the opportunity to say anything to any poster here about his daughters?
Pahoran wrote:Simply splendid. As someone who has been happily married for 22 years, it is something I live by. I hope you not only quote it, but meditate therein day and night.
Now, would you like to take the opportunity to say anything to any poster here about his daughters?
Regards, Pahoran
Can you please explain what you are referring to? I haven't been around long enough to understand the reference.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS
"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Yahoo Bot wrote:I frankly don't understand why people can't tell the difference between a pseudonym and an anonynym (if there is such a word). I use a pseudonym here. But you all know who I am.
I frankly don't understand why people can't tell the difference between a pseudonym and a word I just made up.
"And the human knew the source of life, the woman of him, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, 'I have procreated a man with Yahweh.'" Gen. 4:1, interior quote translated by D. Bokovoy.
Fence Sitter wrote: Your distinction between a pseudonym and an anonynym applies to you not Pahoran. I know you do not care when people use your real name, such is not the case for Pahoran, either on this board or the other.
For what it is worth, when you type Pahoran's real name in a post on this board, the software automatically corrects it to read "Pahoran."
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)