What's the Hullabaloo?

Post by **_RockSlider** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:14 pm

redundant

Post by **_Kishkumen** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:22 pm

gramps wrote:Were you in on this too, Ray?

He most certainly was. He posted here the first name of the person whom they believed to be Scratch before Peterson posted it over on Patheos. He believed Pahoran too.

Post by **_sock puppet** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:38 pm

Kishkumen wrote:
gramps wrote:Were you in on this too, Ray?

He most certainly was. He posted here the first name of the person whom they believed to be Scratch before Peterson posted it over on Patheos. He believed Pahoran too.

Oh, boy, another fallen to the siren call of Pahoran's innuendo and assumption.

Post by **_Kishkumen** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:47 pm

sock puppet wrote:Oh, boy, another fallen to the siren call of Pahoran's innuendo and assumption.

I am distressed when Ray locks arms with Pahoran, because Ray is twice the person Pahoran is.

Post by **_RockSlider** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:54 pm

Maybe shades should consider an anonymous moderator account or two. Perhaps the whole posting as a man or posting as a mod is just to problematic.

Post by **_Yahoo Bot** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:03 pm

I say let's just all get along. Liz, come back. I don't have anybody to complain about if you leave. Scratch, you're always entertaining if not a complete whack job.

Post by **_Kishkumen** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:05 pm

Yahoo Bot wrote:I say let's just all get along. Liz, come back. I don't have anybody to complain about if you leave. Scratch, you're always entertaining if not a complete whack job.

LOLOL!!! I may not agree in all the particulars, but I am in accord with the general spirit of this post.

I'll go one further: Come back, Daniel. You are missed. Give us hell right here on MDB.

Post by **_Chap** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:10 pm

Kishkumen wrote:
gramps wrote:Were you in on this too, Ray?

He most certainly was. He posted here the first name of the person whom they believed to be Scratch before Peterson posted it over on Patheos. He believed Pahoran too.

I don't think we should reproach Ray for falling under the influence of Pahoran.

Pahoran is such a sweet charming guy on the surface, and only those who know him extremely well would ever suspect there might be a hidden hint of malice somewhere in the deep background. Ray just took him at face value, that's all.

Post by **_sock puppet** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:12 pm

Kishkumen wrote:
gramps wrote:Were you in on this too, Ray?

He most certainly was. He posted here the first name of the person whom they believed to be Scratch before Peterson posted it over on Patheos. He believed Pahoran too.

Chap wrote:I don't think we should reproach Ray for falling under the influence of Pahoran.

Pahoran is such a sweet charming guy on the surface, and only those who know him extremely well would ever suspect there might be a hidden hint of malice somewhere in the deep background. Ray just took him at face value, that's all.

That begs the questions: Why is Ray so willing to take any anti-Scratch statement at face value? Why is Ray so willing to taken anything DCP and his minions say at face value?

Post by **_MsJack** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:16 pm

/bump

MsJack wrote:Did this [real name of Chino Blanco] = Doctor Scratch theory originate solely with Pahoran via his investigative abilities?

*crickets*

DiscussMormonism.com

What's the Hullabaloo?

Re: What's the Hullabaloo?

Re: What's the Hullabaloo?

Re: What's the Hullabaloo?

Re: What's the Hullabaloo?

Re: What's the Hullabaloo?

Re: What's the Hullabaloo?

Re: What's the Hullabaloo?

Re: What's the Hullabaloo?

Re: What's the Hullabaloo?

Re: What's the Hullabaloo?